<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Alpha: inexpensive lenses with a M42 adapter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fuchs</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-16661</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fuchs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 03:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-16661</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.  I&#039;ve got an M42 adapter for my Alpha and it works well with many M42 lenses; however, (and you&#039;ll have to forgive my ignorance) some of the old Mamiya lenses with the little button on the back of the lens that when depressed will stop down the aperture (I&#039;m not sure what it&#039;s technically named) do not work as I cannot adjust the aperture. Am I making any sense?  If so, is there a workaround?  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  I&#8217;ve got an M42 adapter for my Alpha and it works well with many M42 lenses; however, (and you&#8217;ll have to forgive my ignorance) some of the old Mamiya lenses with the little button on the back of the lens that when depressed will stop down the aperture (I&#8217;m not sure what it&#8217;s technically named) do not work as I cannot adjust the aperture. Am I making any sense?  If so, is there a workaround?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vintage photos of women</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-16053</link>
		<dc:creator>vintage photos of women</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-16053</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;vintage photos of women...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Sony Alpha: inexpensive lenses with a M42 adapter &#124; Alphatracks[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>vintage photos of women&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Sony Alpha: inexpensive lenses with a M42 adapter | Alphatracks[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deckchairboy</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7307</link>
		<dc:creator>Deckchairboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7307</guid>
		<description>Thanks foor taking the time to share this, real information very well communicated.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks foor taking the time to share this, real information very well communicated.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7306</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7306</guid>
		<description>Great clear info,been snaping since 72,thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great clear info,been snaping since 72,thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReviewsBonus</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>ReviewsBonus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>We are now in the enviornment of selling as opposed to selling; too many business homeowners confuse the 2 or suppose they are one and the same. To successfully market your self, you must display to your potential &#039;patrons&#039; you might have what they want. This means making a brand image for yourself that differentiates you enough so people will need to be with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are now in the enviornment of selling as opposed to selling; too many business homeowners confuse the 2 or suppose they are one and the same. To successfully market your self, you must display to your potential &#8216;patrons&#8217; you might have what they want. This means making a brand image for yourself that differentiates you enough so people will need to be with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7304</link>
		<dc:creator>S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7304</guid>
		<description>&gt; There is no way for the Sony Alpha to â€œreadâ€ the focal length of a M42 lens.



Exactly for this reason, modern Pentax DSLRs ask for approximate focal length when a manual lens is mounted. My K20D allows to enter focal length only approximately (to choose one of the presets), but it seems to be enough for the in-body image stabilization.



So probably this can be fixed with firmware if Sony allows for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; There is no way for the Sony Alpha to â€œreadâ€ the focal length of a M42 lens.</p>
<p>Exactly for this reason, modern Pentax DSLRs ask for approximate focal length when a manual lens is mounted. My K20D allows to enter focal length only approximately (to choose one of the presets), but it seems to be enough for the in-body image stabilization.</p>
<p>So probably this can be fixed with firmware if Sony allows for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Scott</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7303</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Excellent information and exactly what I was looking for. Do you plan to write a Sony A850/900 book I hope? I was a combat photographer in Vietnam from 1968 to 1970. I have a special fondness for Pentax Spotmatic cameras and lenses along with Leicas, the only two trouble free cameras I used there (I never tried a Minolta though). I used to be able to load a Pentax while crawling on my back in a firefight in the dark and they always survived monsoon season too. I have a fairly complete set of Takumar lenses (up to 300mm), can forgo auto-focus and am experienced at estimating exposure but IS would be real attractive. Later I worked as an engineer for Sony so either an A850 or A900 seems a good choice since it is the affordable full frame camera. Is there a reason that an M42 to A850/900 mount adapter could not have a chip with user set control to select focal length so IS would work with multiple focal length lens? Finally, if you purchased an M42 mount adapter where cost was not a big concern which brand or model would you purchase today? Thanks much,

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Excellent information and exactly what I was looking for. Do you plan to write a Sony A850/900 book I hope? I was a combat photographer in Vietnam from 1968 to 1970. I have a special fondness for Pentax Spotmatic cameras and lenses along with Leicas, the only two trouble free cameras I used there (I never tried a Minolta though). I used to be able to load a Pentax while crawling on my back in a firefight in the dark and they always survived monsoon season too. I have a fairly complete set of Takumar lenses (up to 300mm), can forgo auto-focus and am experienced at estimating exposure but IS would be real attractive. Later I worked as an engineer for Sony so either an A850 or A900 seems a good choice since it is the affordable full frame camera. Is there a reason that an M42 to A850/900 mount adapter could not have a chip with user set control to select focal length so IS would work with multiple focal length lens? Finally, if you purchased an M42 mount adapter where cost was not a big concern which brand or model would you purchase today? Thanks much,</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7302</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7302</guid>
		<description>&quot;On the A100 and A700 there is an option in the menu to disable this shutter lock; on both cameras this option is on the second page of the custom menu (gear icon, purple colour on the A100). On the A100 the option is the second of two â€œShutter lockâ€ options and should be set to â€œOff: no lensâ€. On the A700 the option is â€œRelease w/oLensâ€ and should be set to â€œEnableâ€.&quot; (http://www.flickr.com/groups/sony_alpha/discuss/72157608288010526/)



good luck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On the A100 and A700 there is an option in the menu to disable this shutter lock; on both cameras this option is on the second page of the custom menu (gear icon, purple colour on the A100). On the A100 the option is the second of two â€œShutter lockâ€ options and should be set to â€œOff: no lensâ€. On the A700 the option is â€œRelease w/oLensâ€ and should be set to â€œEnableâ€.&#8221; (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/sony_alpha/discuss/72157608288010526/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/groups/sony_alpha/discuss/72157608288010526/</a>)</p>
<p>good luck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gordon</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7301</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7301</guid>
		<description>I bought a plain M42 adaptor to use wuth my A700. The adaptor is a good fit and I attached a Pentax 50mm lens to it. I set the A700 to manual. I was able to manually focus OK but when I tried to press the shutter I got a message on the LCD - &quot;no lens attached. Shutter locked&quot;.  What am I doing wrong ?



Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a plain M42 adaptor to use wuth my A700. The adaptor is a good fit and I attached a Pentax 50mm lens to it. I set the A700 to manual. I was able to manually focus OK but when I tried to press the shutter I got a message on the LCD &#8211; &#8220;no lens attached. Shutter locked&#8221;.  What am I doing wrong ?</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/141/comment-page-1#comment-7300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/141#comment-7300</guid>
		<description>T-mount is not a camera mount like M42 is. T-mount is an interchangeable mount. You screw the T-mount adapter onto the lens and then mount this assembly to a camera. T-mount adapters for a wide range of cameras are (were) available and lots of great lenses. Some even produced to this day.

The normal T-mount has no aperture coupling to the camera body.

T-mount is always manual focus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-mount is not a camera mount like M42 is. T-mount is an interchangeable mount. You screw the T-mount adapter onto the lens and then mount this assembly to a camera. T-mount adapters for a wide range of cameras are (were) available and lots of great lenses. Some even produced to this day.</p>
<p>The normal T-mount has no aperture coupling to the camera body.</p>
<p>T-mount is always manual focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

