<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, just what is a low-end dSLR camera anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/20</link>
	<description>Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:36:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can the Sony Alpha be consideered a PRO camera? : Alphatracks</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/20/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Can the Sony Alpha be consideered a PRO camera? : Alphatracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/20#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] A few weeks back, I speculated on whether the A100 was Sony&#8217;s low end SLR. (So, just what is a low-end dSLR camera anyway?) Now it time to look in the other direction. What does Sony have on tap for an Alpha Pro level SLR? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks back, I speculated on whether the A100 was Sony&#8217;s low end SLR. (So, just what is a low-end dSLR camera anyway?) Now it time to look in the other direction. What does Sony have on tap for an Alpha Pro level SLR? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
