Comments on: Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind? http://alphatracks.com/archives/62 Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:05:28 +0000 hourly 1 By: Payday Loan http://alphatracks.com/archives/62/comment-page-1#comment-2448 Payday Loan Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:53:10 +0000 http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2448 My son and I concur with your ingenious conjecture relating to nounces new 12.47MP sensor | Alphatracks. The passage might be really significant specifically to people of Tahoka ! My son and I concur with your ingenious conjecture relating to nounces new 12.47MP sensor | Alphatracks. The passage might be really significant specifically to people of Tahoka !

]]> By: Nikon D3 and D300 provide clues about new Sony Alphas | Alphatracks http://alphatracks.com/archives/62/comment-page-1#comment-2447 Nikon D3 and D300 provide clues about new Sony Alphas | Alphatracks Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:56:40 +0000 http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2447 [...] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog « Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind? [...] [...] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog « Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind? [...]

]]> By: Houckster http://alphatracks.com/archives/62/comment-page-1#comment-2446 Houckster Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:40:08 +0000 http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2446 The extra pixels that Sony's new processor provides is a nice feature but the biggest problem I have with the Alpha 100 is the image viewing screen which is virtually useless except in the shade and that's not always convenient. It also needs finer detail for adjudging the sharpness of the image. A second shortcoming is the reduced exposure latitude compared to film, even slides. A couple of years ago, I was dead certain a FF image sensor was necessary. Now, I really couldn't care less. Even the A100 is delivering nice crisp 8.5x11 pictures that are indistinguishable, sharpnesswise, from Kodachrome shots. Besides, my lenses, all new Tamrons, are optimized for the APS-C sensor. The extra pixels that Sony’s new processor provides is a nice feature but the biggest problem I have with the Alpha 100 is the image viewing screen which is virtually useless except in the shade and that’s not always convenient. It also needs finer detail for adjudging the sharpness of the image.

A second shortcoming is the reduced exposure latitude compared to film, even slides.

A couple of years ago, I was dead certain a FF image sensor was necessary. Now, I really couldn’t care less. Even the A100 is delivering nice crisp 8.5×11 pictures that are indistinguishable, sharpnesswise, from Kodachrome shots. Besides, my lenses, all new Tamrons, are optimized for the APS-C sensor.

]]> By: Chris TM http://alphatracks.com/archives/62/comment-page-1#comment-2445 Chris TM Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:12:00 +0000 http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2445 You've hit the nail on the head. If I had a wishlist for the new dslrs from Sony, it would be Canon comparable noise reduction at high ISOs, a much, much quieter shutter and much better focusing in low-light conditions. Hopefully, they will deliver. A full frame sensor would be nice too. You’ve hit the nail on the head. If I had a wishlist for the new dslrs from Sony, it would be Canon comparable noise reduction at high ISOs, a much, much quieter shutter and much better focusing in low-light conditions. Hopefully, they will deliver. A full frame sensor would be nice too.

]]>