<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alphatracks &#187; DSLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/category/minolta/dslr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphatracks.com</link>
	<description>Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:29:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alpha A390 and A290: new Sony dSLR models</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/817</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/817#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sony dSLR factory will soon be cranking out two new entry-level models: the A290 and A390.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id=" " class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 460px"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_31.jpg" alt="Sony Alpha A390 and A 290" title="Sony Alpha A390 and A 290" width="450" height="337" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-816" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony Alpha A390 will offer Quick Live-View and a 14.2mp sensor.</p></div></p>
<p><strong>June 10, 2010:</strong> Remember when Sony waited a full 18 months to introduce a new dSLR after releasing the A100? Now it seems they seldom wait more than 18 days before releasing a new model. Okay, that may be a slight exaggeration, but the Sony dSLR factory will soon be cranking out two new entry-level models: the A290 and A390.</p>
<p>Sony is aiming the new A-mount cameras at first time dSLR users, and the specs are similar to earlier Alpha starter dSLRs. The new cameras are obviously closely related, the principle difference being the tilting live view system on the A390. </p>
<p><div id="attachment_815" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A290_15.jpg" alt="Sony A290" title="A290_15" width="300" height="284" class="size-full wp-image-815" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony A290</p></div>Both cameras will use a 14.2 megapixel sensor, and they include the usual Sony Alpha feature set: Steady Shot image stabilization, Sony and Minolta A-mount lens compatibility, pop-up flash and 9-point auotfocus system. </p>
<p>A couple of things set the new modles apart from earlier editions. There is a new grip design, which Sony claims is more comfortable to use. in addition, both cameras include HDMI output and BRAVIA Sync, so you can view images on your big-screen television if you are so inclined.</p>
<p>Because Sony is targeting first time dSLR buyers with these cameras, both models include Sony&#8217;s on-screen Help Guide and Graphic Display program. </p>
<p>The tilting live-view follows the design first offered in the A350 and A300. </p>
<p><div id="attachment_814" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 309px"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_27.jpg" alt="Tilt LSD screen on the A390" title="A390_27" width="299" height="207" class="size-full wp-image-814" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Tilt LSD screen on the A390</p></div>Sony of Europe has announced that the A290 and A390 will be available in Summer 2010. Will the new cameras be sold in the United States? So far, there is no mention of the new cameras on Sony&#8217;s US web site. The Sony A450, profiled here some months back, has been on the market for several months&#8230;but it is not sold in the US. </p>
<p>Will Sony offer the A290/A390 in the USA? Or do they have something else in mind?
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Alpha+A390+and+A290%3A+new+Sony+dSLR+models+http://bit.ly/acXFAy" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Alpha+A390+and+A290%3A+new+Sony+dSLR+models+http://bit.ly/acXFAy" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/817/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony A900, We hardly knew ye. Goodbye flagship?</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/736</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/736#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flagship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the Sony Hong Kong site leak news of the demise of the Sony  Alpha A900?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_744" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 307px"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/DSLR-A900VG_left_med.jpg" alt="End of the line for the A900?" title="DSLR-A900VG_left_med" width="297" height="210" class="size-full wp-image-744" /><p class="wp-caption-text">End of the line for the A900?</p></div><strong>May 10, 2010</strong> If you&#8217;ve been caught up in the excitement of the imminent Nex-3 and Nex-5 EVIL cameras from Sony, you may have overlooked the bells tolling for the A900.</p>
<p>Several rumor sites are claiming that Sony&#8217;s Hong Kong site is listing the A900 as discontinued.</p>
<p>Curious, I checked the site myself. I couldn&#8217;t find anything expressly saying  the A900 was discontinued, but significantly, the A900 was not listed among the Alpha dSLRs offered for sale. The site lists the top model as the A850.</p>
<p>It could be a simple error, but I am inclined the rumors have at least some truth to them, I don&#8217;t have access to sales figures, but I would guess  that A900 sales have flatlined since the introduction of the Sony A850. The cameras are nearly identical, but the A850 can save you several hundred dollars. Unless you really, really need the faster frame rate of the A900, the A850 is a much better bargain.</p>
<p>Does this mean the A850 is the new flagship? I doubt it. I would assume that there is a new flagship on the launching ways, and Sony will replace the A900 with something better. At least I hope that is the case.</p>
<p>Some of the rumor sites are expecting an A900 replacement to be announced along side the new Sony EVIL twins.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that. I think a brand new top-of-the-line dSLR deserves it&#8217;s own special day. At the same time, a completely new camera system should have it&#8217;s own special day.</p>
<p>I could be wrong, but I would expect we will see the Sony Nex models first, with a new full-frame dSLR (if there is one coming soon) following some time afterward.</p>
<p>We may know as soon as tomorrow, as Sony has apparently chosen May 11 to announce the Nex system.
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+A900%2C+We+hardly+knew+ye.+Goodbye+flagship%3F+http://bit.ly/cCnXWI" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+A900%2C+We+hardly+knew+ye.+Goodbye+flagship%3F+http://bit.ly/cCnXWI" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/736/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want great floral photos? Try a conservatory</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/686</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/686#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orchid Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatories are great for photographs. Vivid colors, exotic subjects, wonderful lighting and a protected location provide the basis for portfolio-worthy images.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; width: 252px; padding-top; 9px;"><div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 240px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32698815@N04/4540724494/" title="Picture Perfect day by TomBonner, on Flickr"><img alt="A number of venders were on hand for the Picture Perfect day at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens, including Apple Computer who demoed the new Aperture 3." src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4005/4540724494_695f5f2b7e_m.jpg" title="Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens" width="240" height="160" style="margin-top: 12px;" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A number of venders were on hand for the Picture Perfect day at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens, including Apple Computer who demoed the new Aperture 3.</p></div></div>
<p><strong>April 22. 2010</strong> A few weeks ago, I attended the &#8220;Picture Perfect&#8221; weekend at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens. The program included several photo workshops and gear demonstrations. After the workshop concluded, I wandered over to the Orchid Conservatory and collected some new images.</p>
<p>The conservatory is great location for photographs. In the first place, it is filled with exotic, colorful flowers, most of which you won&#8217;t see in the average garden. So the conservatory offers up an almost unlimited array of vivid subjects.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the lighting at the DSBG Conservatory is fantastic. There is glass in nearly every direction, and the resulting shadow-free light can turn an ordinary snapshot into a portfolio photo.</p>
<p>Finally, because you are indoors, there is no breeze to disturb the leaves and petals. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love taking my Sony Alpha dSLR outdoors and capturing nature photos. But when you are trying to capture razor sharp close-ups, any kind of breeze becomes a frustration. You get the composition just right, then a cats paw comes up and shifts your subject around.</p>
<p>Inside a conservatory, there are no sudden gusts, so the flowers remain stationary while you arrange your shot. You can take all the time you need to set up your image, confident that the focus and composition won&#8217;t change.</p>
<div style="float: left; width: 345px;"><div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 313px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32698815@N04/4540081497/"><img alt="A  tripod and a sharp lens make it a snap to get images like this at your local conservatory." src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2755/4540081497_972b4dcb52.jpg" title="DSBG Orchid Conservatory" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A steady tripod and a sharp lens make it a snap to get images like this at your local conservatory.</p></div></div>
<p>I put together a gallery of my best images from the <a href="http://alphatracks.com/orchids/">DSBG Orchid Conservatory</a>. While there was plenty of light to shoot hand-held, I used a tripod for the bulk of the shooting that day. Because my subjects were unlikely to move, placing the camera on a tripod allowed me to set critical focus knowing I wouldn&#8217;t shift the lens toward or away from the flowers. </p>
<p>Although I used a wide-ange lens to capture some establishing shots, photographing orchids is work for long lenses. I used the Minolta 70-210 f/4 &#8220;beercan&#8221; for the majority of my gallery images. The beercan features a close-focusing mode, as well as wonderful bokeh in the out of focus areas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty happy with my results. If there is an indoor conservatory in your area, grab a tripod,  your camera and some long, close-focusing lenses. If it is anything liker the Daniel Stowe Conservatory, you will come away with some great photos!</p>
<h2>View the <a href="http://alphatracks.com/orchids/" style="color: blue" >DSBG Orchid Gallery</a></h2>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Want+great+floral+photos%3F+Try+a+conservatory+http://bit.ly/d27lxf" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Want+great+floral+photos%3F+Try+a+conservatory+http://bit.ly/d27lxf" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/686/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Alpha A200 dSLR: a Photographic Autopsy</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/596</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/596#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graphic photos of a wrecked and dismantled Sony Alpha dSLR provide insights into what's inside our digital cameras.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 12px;"><div id="attachment_599" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://bit.ly/9KfCtA" target="_blank"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/smashed_dslr.jpg" alt="The English Russia website digs deep into the innards of a crushed Sony Alpha dSLR " title="dSLR autopsy " width="300" height="320" class="size-full wp-image-599" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The English Russia website digs deep into the<br />innards of a crushed Sony Alpha dSLR </p></div></div>
<p><b>March 17, 2010</b> If you&#8217;ve got a strong stomach, you might want to take a look at the A200 photo essay on the <strong>English Russia</strong> website.</p>
<p>The photos examine a very mangled <strong>Sony Alpha A200 dSLR.</strong> I don&#8217;t know what happened to this camera, but it&#8217;s demise was very violent. It wasn&#8217;t just dropped or knocked off an end table. </p>
<p>Since the site doesn&#8217;t explain how the camera got in this state, I let my imagination fill in the blanks. It might have been tossed off the observation deck of a very tall building, or someone may have left it on the roof of their car and it flew off at 70mph. It might have been run over by a truck. My favorite theory is that a paparazzi tired to surprise Chuck Norris and Norris deftly dismantled his camera with his feet.</p>
<p>Whatever happened to the poor A200, its days as a fine photographic instrument are over. The only thing this wreck of a camera could capture is dust.</p>
<p>But that isn&#8217;t to say the dSLR is completely useless. It will never record an image to a memory card again, but it can serve as a learning tool. The people at the English Russia site grabbed a screwdriver and a working camera and proceeded with a thorough autopsy of the dead dSLR. </p>
<p>If you love fine cameras, the photos are disturbing, but fascinating. These photos may be a little too graphic for A200 owners. Consider this a warning. If you have nightmares after visiting the site, don&#8217;t blame me. </p>
<h3>Not a dSLR repair manual</h3>
<p>This is not a disassembly manual. These photos won&#8217;t teach you how to repair your Sony Alpha A200.</p>
<p>Instead, these images are reminiscent of a high-school biology class, where the students dissect a frog to see what is inside. The students don&#8217;t intend to put the frog back together afterward, so they simply cut away muscle and sinew to get to the more interesting bits underneath.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what happened with the A200. They dismembered the camera to see what was inside, knowing they couldn&#8217;t hurt anything. The camera was dead, repairing it wasn&#8217;t an option. So they delved deep into the innards and recorded what they found.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen pristine cut-away cameras from Sony and other manufacturers. Those photos don&#8217;t have the impact the photos (apparently taken by <a href="http://bit.ly/aSAqci" target="_blank">Jollypix.com</a>) have. Looking at the guts of the camera, you gain a deeper appreciation of the complexity inside an ordinary dSLR. Don&#8217;t forget that the A200 has fewer features than Sony&#8217;s high-end dSLRs. What would the innards of an Alpha A900 or A850 look like?</p>
<p>My original Minolta SRT was a fully mechanical camera. The only electronic hardware was in the meter. Each subsequent SLR I bought added additional circuitry, becoming more and more electronic inside.</p>
<p>Examining these amazing photos shows just how far cameras have advanced from the old mechanical cameras of the past. It also makes me wonder how the inside of my dSLR can be so packed with circuits and ribbon cable, yet be so reliable. It seems like there are all manner of things that could go wrong. Yet my cameras continue to function well and record outstanding images under very demanding conditions.</p>
<p>These images should make all of us appreciate our cameras and how special they are. They are also a reminder to the paparazzi in us all to keep our dSLRs away from Chuck Norris!</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://bit.ly/9KfCtA" target="_blank">Sony dSLR dissection</a> at the English Russia website. </p>
<p>Additional photo at <a href="http://bit.ly/aSAqci" target="_blank">Jollypix.com</a></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+Alpha+A200+dSLR%3A+a+Photographic+Autopsy+http://bit.ly/b0WDGs" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+Alpha+A200+dSLR%3A+a+Photographic+Autopsy+http://bit.ly/b0WDGs" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/596/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Sony Alpha hardware at the 2010 PMA Show</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/554</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/554#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMA Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sony teased Alpha users with several "concepts" at the 2010 PMA show. No word on when these cameras will be sold, but this is a preview of future Sony Alphas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div id="attachment_562" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-562" title="Sony_PMA" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Sony_PMA.jpg" alt="Sony displayed some very exciting concepts at the 2010 PMA show." width="450" height="338" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony displayed some very exciting concepts at the 2010 PMA show.</p></div></p>
<p>Sony teased Alpha photographers with several interesting &#8220;concepts&#8221; at the latest PMA show. As these are concepts, there is no definite word on when or if these cameras will appear. Still, the concepts Sony has shown at previous PMA shows have come to fruition, and Sony has already hinted about the new lenses they showed off at Anaheim.</p>
<p>Sony&#8217;s new concepts include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Concept model of an ultra-compact interchangeable lens digital camera system that packs the quality of a DSLR camera in an extraordinarily small body, along with interchangeable lenses</li>
<li>Mid-range concept camera for advanced users (a successor to the α700) as well as concept mainstream models</li>
<li>Prototype of a Super Telephoto Lens (500mm F4 G) with class-leading optical performance</li>
<li>Prototype of a Distagon T 24mm F2 ZA SSM, new Carl Zeiss wide angle lens for superior shots of landscapes and sweeping vistas</li>
</ul>
<p>The new &#8220;mirrorless&#8221; concept is NOT a 4/3 type camera, but appears to be Sony&#8217;s own design. It will offer interchangeable lenses on a tiny body similar to a larger point and shoot. It will carry the Alpha name, but I can&#8217;t be sure it uses A-Mount lenses. I hope Sony will not attempt to produce two separate lens lines.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_563" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-563" title="sonyconcept2" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sonyconcept2.jpg" alt="New mirrorless interchangeable lens Alpha cameras are coming; will they use A-Mount lenses?" width="450" height="261" /><p class="wp-caption-text">New mirrorless interchangeable lens Alpha cameras are coming; will they use A-Mount lenses?</p></div></p>
<p>The other two dSLRs are look more conventional. Neither model has a model name engraved on it, and it is difficult to see where Sony could actually add a model name, as there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any room between the grip and the prism.</p>
<p>The A700 successor appears smaller and more rounded than the original A700. I don&#8217;t see a PC sync port, but there is a top mounted LCD panel. No word if the new model will have video, but it does appear to have a pop-up flash.</p>
<p><div id="attachment_561" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 460px"><img class="size-full wp-image-561" title="sonyconcept3" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sonyconcept3.jpg" alt="Also on display, the successor to the A700 and a new very compact ALpha model." width="450" height="336" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Also on display, the successor to the A700 and a new very compact ALpha model.</p></div></p>
<p>The other dSLR is much smaller. Based on the comparison between it and the A700 replacement, it is possibly the smallest dSLR on the market. Sony hasn&#8217;t provided an indication of the sensor size or megapixels, but I think it might create a lot of interest for those who want a compact dSLR that still has an optical mirror.
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=New+Sony+Alpha+hardware+at+the+2010+PMA+Show+http://bit.ly/baihnL" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=New+Sony+Alpha+hardware+at+the+2010+PMA+Show+http://bit.ly/baihnL" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/554/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sony Alpha A450: Where does it fit in Sony&#8217;s line up?</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/363</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/363#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new A450 takes the highly regarded A550, ditches the Quick Live View and the tilt-out LCD but maintains the fast 7fps burst mode. In addition, Sony claims the NPH500 battery should give users over a 1000 pictures on a single charge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 12px 0 0; color: blue;">
<p><div id="attachment_365" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 220px"><img class="size-full wp-image-365" title="Sony_Alpha_A450" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Sony_Alpha_A450.jpg" alt="New Sony A450 will join the Alpha fleet in February." width="210" height="167" /><p class="wp-caption-text">New Sony A450 will join the Alpha fleet in February.</p></div></p>
</div>
<p>Remember the time when some people said Sony wasn&#8217;t serious about the dSLR market because it took the company 18 months to release another camera after the initial A100 came on scene? Now we know what the Sony Engineers were doing during those 18 months; they were busy creating cameras to fit every conceivable dSLR niche. Not content with the six (or was it seven?) new Alpha models introduced in 2009, Sony is starting off 2010 with another entry in the crowded low-end of the market.</p>
<h2>Introducing the new A450</h2>
<p>The new entry, dubbed the A450, takes the highly regarded A550, ditches the Quick Live View and the tilt-out LCD but maintains the fast 7fps burst mode. In addition, Sony claims the NPH500 battery should give users over a 1000 pictures on a single charge.</p>
<p>The is also an auto HDR mode, and naturally the camera includes the popular Stay Shot image stabilization feature. Another new feature is the Manual Focus Check Live View, which can preview the image at 7x or 14x image previews.</p>
<h2>A significant new dSLR</h2>
<p>Some people have already started dismissing the new entry, since it lacks some of the more compelling features of the A550 and does not offer video. If Sony prices this A450 right, however, I think it will be a very significant entry in Sony&#8217;s dSLR arsenal.</p>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 12px; color: blue;">
<p><div id="attachment_366" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-366" title="sony_alpha-A450_controls" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sony_alpha-A450_controls-300x248.jpg" alt="Control layout of the A450 is similar to the A500 and A550." width="300" height="248" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Control layout of the A450 is similar to the A500 and A550.</p></div></div>
<p>Fist, as I already said, Sony&#8217;s selection of lower end dSLRs is getting quite crowded. I think Sony might start weeding out some of the A230, A330 and A30 models once the A450 is on the scene. The A450 can&#8217;t replace all of those models by itself, obviously. But since it is less full featured than the A550, Sony will have price the A450 much lower to make it attractive.</p>
<p>The 12mp A500 lists for $749, while the 14mp A550 is priced at $949. So where will the A450 come in?</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t much room between the A380 and the A500 for the A450 to play in. If the A450 drops below the price of the A380, then buyers will have an interesting decision to make. Grab the A380 with the tilt-out Live View or go for the A450 with its 7fps shooting speed and nearly twice the battery life.</p>
<p>If Sony prices the A450  higher than the A500, the new camera might be hurt by the A500. Price the A450 under the A500 and you might just kill sales of the A500.</p>
<p>Sony hasn&#8217;t officially announced the A450 at this point, but the Sony press release is all over the internet. It is expected that the official announcement will come at the CES show  this week. While the release doesn&#8217;t indicate a price, it does say the camera will be available in February, 2010.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find the Sony Global <a href="http://bit.ly/6DDzIr" target="_blank">Alpha A450 presentation</a> here. Sony has also made available a <a href="http://bit.ly/8Ni2xZ" target="_blank">detailed A450 Spec Sheet</a> in PDF format.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have more on the A450 as details emerge.
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The+Sony+Alpha+A450%3A+Where+does+it+fit+in+Sony%E2%80%99s+line+up%3F+http://bit.ly/60qO1D" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=The+Sony+Alpha+A450%3A+Where+does+it+fit+in+Sony%E2%80%99s+line+up%3F+http://bit.ly/60qO1D" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/363/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A foggy Christmas at the Billy Graham Library</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/352</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/352#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High ISO images of nighttime Christmas decorations at the Billy Graham Library in the fog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 16px;;">
<p><div id="attachment_351" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-351" title="Silo, Billy Graham Library" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/billy_graham_silo-199x300.jpg" alt="The Silio at the Billy Graham Library decorated for Christmas" width="199" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Silio at the Billy Graham Library decorated for Christmas</p></div></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Dec. 23, 2009</strong> My family spent a recent evening at the Billy Graham Library to enjoy the wonderful Christmas decorations. My Sony Alpha was welcome, no restrictions on photography, except that flash cannot be used in the exhibit halls.</p>
<p>No problem, I simply cranked the ISO up to 800 and shot without a flash. As I have said in the past, I am usually conservative about ISO, but I enjoyed the freedom that comes with shooting at a high ISO.</p>
<p>The Library featured decorations inside and out, and as an unexpected bonus, there was a heavy layer of fog in the area.  I hate driving in fog, but it adds drama and mystery to photos. The mist defused the lights, producing interesting streaks and shadows.</p>
<p>You can visit the <a href="http://adventuresindesign.com/minolta/009_billy_graham_library/index.html">Christmas photo gallery</a> here. Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>Wishing all my readers a Merry Christmas and a great 2010!
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=A+foggy+Christmas+at+the+Billy+Graham+Library+http://bit.ly/6hVQc3" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=A+foggy+Christmas+at+the+Billy+Graham+Library+http://bit.ly/6hVQc3" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/352/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halloween is a perfect time to try Available Light Photography</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/266</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/266#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
If I had used a flash, it would have killed the mood of this Jack O&#8217; Lantern portrait. You would have seen more of the pumpkin, but the eerie orange light would be lost.

(Part 2 of 2. Read part 1 at: Halloween Photos: Break the Rules to achieve Maximum Interest) 
Electronic Flash is a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-top: 20px;margin-right: 28px"><img class="size-full wp-image-331" title="jack_o_lantern" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/jack_o_lantern.jpg" alt="If I had used a flash, it would have killed the mood of this Jack O' Lantern portrait. You would have seen more of the pumpkin, but the eerie orange light would be lost." width="280" height="269" /></p>
<p style="width: 270px; text-align: left; font-weight: bold; color: #496eb9;">If I had used a flash, it would have killed the mood of this Jack O&#8217; Lantern portrait. You would have seen more of the pumpkin, but the eerie orange light would be lost.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>(Part 2 of 2. Read part 1 at: <a href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/227"></strong>Halloween Photos: Break the Rules to achieve Maximum Interest</a>) </p>
<p>Electronic Flash is a great tool, but it isn&#8217;t the answer to every application. Well-lit subjects don&#8217;t convey creepy or sinister very well. So you can leave the flash home and welcome the dark shadows and eerie blotches of light you get when you shoot after sundown without artificial light.</p>
<p>As a rule, I like the steadiness of a tripod, but this is a case where a tripod will just get in the way. Do you really want to open up a tripod around a group of excited kids (or young-hearted adults) wandering around wearing masks? The mask reduces vision, making it likely someone will trip over your tripod legs. I don&#8217;t think it is worth the hassle or the risk.</p>
<p>If you absolutely have to have some sort of support, you could consider a monopod. I prefer to just use the Steady Shot feature in the Sony Alpha. As long as you use a fairly short focal length, you can get sharp images with Steady Shot at shutter speeds of less than 1/8 second. If your subject moves you&#8217;ll see blur, but camera shake won&#8217;t be a concern. Once again, you can use the blurring caused by subject movement as a special effect.  It&#8217;s not a drawback&#8230;it is art!</p>
<p>You can also try deliberately moving the camera during long exposures to exaggerate light streaks. If your subjects are carrying flash lights or light sticks, there is the ever popular technique of light writing. Take a long exposure and swing the lights to create light trails by drawing in the dark.</p>
<h3>Whose afraid of noise?</h3>
<p>I&#8217;m usually conservative about ISO and I normally avoid the higher ISO ranges. High ISO generates noise, so I use whatever techniques I can to keep a moderate ISO setting.  I think this is one time when I might abandon that caution and crank the ISO up to the max. While I don&#8217;t watch many horror films, I&#8217;ve seen the previews of recent films of this genre. Ever since the Blair Witch Project, Hollywood films have appeared with obvious film grain, bad lighting, jerky camera work and severe vignetting. Why not join this trend (just for one night) and capitalize on high ISO and maximum noise?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not recommending that you shoot all your Halloween images at ISO 3200, but as a creative effect, exaggerated noise might set some of your images apart.</p>
<h3>Follow Hitchcock style&#8230;less is more</h3>
<p>Since we are breaking rules, throw out the idea of seeing everything in your images. Alfred Hitchcock was a master of this. He would only show you part of something. The scary parts would be hidden in the shadows. You couldn&#8217;t see anything, but there was&#8230;something. You didn&#8217;t know exactly what was there, but the hair on your neck started tingling anyways.</p>
<p>You can use this same technique with your still photography. Reveal only part of a scary costume, hiding much of the character in shadow. Use shallow depth of field to partly conceal a ghoul in a dim, blurry area of your image. Use a highlight to display a vampire&#8217;s fangs, while the rest of the creature is obscured in darkness.</p>
<h3>Play around with the white balance</h3>
<p>The auto white balance on the Sony Alpha typically works very well. This is another area where you might deliberately turn off the auto function and experiment with setting the wrong WB for the conditions. Shooting under tungsten lights with the camera set to daylight WB will yield a red cast in the image. Florescent lighting will look green. Set the camera to the correct white balance for electronic flash, then shoot under tungsten lighting without the flash. The result will cast the image with a deep, ice blue.</p>
<p>You can use this to add the appropriate color shift to your photos.  Follow Hollywood&#8217;s lead. In the movies, space monsters usually display a green cast, while monsters often take on a blue shade.</p>
<p><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/halloween_streaks.jpg" alt="Hitchcock style self portrait. The shadow was shot at ISO 3200, with the camera held at my waist. The light came from an overhead street light. The streaks came from a second image, shot at a 1/2 sec. exposure and overlaid on the shadow picture in Photoshop." title="halloween_streaks" width="400" height="266" class="size-full wp-image-332" /></p>
<p style="width: 400px; text-align: left; font-weight: bold; color: #496eb9;">Hitchcock style self portrait. The shadow was shot at ISO 3200, with the camera held at my waist. The light came from an overhead street light. The streaks came from a second image, shot at a 1/2 sec. exposure and overlaid on the shadow picture in Photoshop.</p>
<p>Of course, if you shoot RAW, you can easily manipulate the white balance on your computer. Still it is helpful to see the effect of WB range on the LCD screen when you shoot.</p>
<h3>Consider Black and White Halloween photos</h3>
<p>Another idea is to jettison color all together.  Some of the most famous horror movies of all time were shot in black and white. Even some modern feature films resort to monocolor to enhance the spookiness. High contrast black &amp; white images can look truly stark and foreboding. While you could shoot in the black &amp; white mode, I prefer to shoot in color and convert to B&amp;W on the computer.</p>
<p>Programs like Photoshop and Lightroom allow you to desaturate an image while leaving a hint of color in the image. I leave it up to you to think of ways you could use this technique to customize your Halloween photos.</p>
<h3>Halloween is a great time to play with special effects filters</h3>
<p>If you own special effects filters, dig them out for Halloween. You can get some interesting images by combining special effects filters with bizarre costumes and decorations.</p>
<p>When I started in photography, one common special effect was to smear Vaseline on an old filter. You can smear the grease to create weird out-of-focus patterns that strangely distort the appearance of your subject. This will give you a one-of-a-kind effect that will set your images apart from those of anyone else.</p>
<p>If you want to try this, be sure to use an inexpensive filter. <strong>Never</strong> use anything like this on the elements of your expensive lenses.</p>
<h3>Vary effects, don&#8217;t shoot too many of the same type</h3>
<p>With any special effect technique, a little goes a long, long way. The first time a person see a nicely done effect, their response is &#8220;cool!&#8221; After seeing several similar photos in a row, the impact starts to wane. If the entire gallery is composed of the same effects repeated over and over, the viewer will grow bored and restless.</p>
<p>So mix things up. Try a variety of effects, so your gallery or slide show doesn&#8217;t look stale. You can even mix in some more conventional straight portraits. These will contrast nicely with the more extreme images and show off the costumes and decorations without any distraction.</p>
<p>I am not advocating that  you use these experiments as an excuse to pass off shoddy work as &#8220;art.&#8221; When I mess around with this sort of thing, I realize that the bulk of my images will be rubbish. Hopefully, however, at least some of this trial and error photography will result in unforgettable images.  Even if I fail to achieve anything successful, I will have learned more about abstract photography and what works and what doesn’t. That will make me all the better when I return to shooting my normal, carefully crafted photos.
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Halloween+is+a+perfect+time+to+try+Available+Light+Photography+http://bit.ly/3kW7DZ" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Halloween+is+a+perfect+time+to+try+Available+Light+Photography+http://bit.ly/3kW7DZ" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/266/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Alpha A750: did Sony Style leak details?</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/327</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/327#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony DSLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October 29, 2009:Sony Alpha rumors are always thick on the ground, but the latest one seems to have some real teeth. The website Lets Go Digital has a very interesting screen shot from a Sony Style web page that clearly shows an entry for the &#8220;new&#8221; Sony A750.
You can check out the Sony Style Alpha [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>October 29, 2009:</strong>Sony Alpha rumors are always thick on the ground, but the latest one seems to have some real teeth. The website <strong>Lets Go Digital </strong>has a very interesting screen shot from a Sony Style web page that clearly shows an entry for the &#8220;new&#8221; <strong>Sony A750</strong>.</p>
<p>You can check out the <a href="http://bit.ly/1iRu0E">Sony Style Alpha A750</a> leak here.</p>
<p>Lets Go Digital further speculates the new Alpha 750 will be a 14.6MP, full-frame dSLR, priced between the current A550 and the new A850. If so, this sounds like a sweet semi-professional Sony dSLR: full-frame, low noise and reasonably priced. Bring it!</p>
<p>If you thinking of buying a Sony Alpha, I wouldn&#8217;t let this tidbit stop you. It is probably too late to get the A750 into stores before Christmas, which means Sony will probably hold off on the introduction until early 2010. Of course, I&#8217;ve been wrong before&#8230;
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+Alpha+A750%3A+did+Sony+Style+leak+details%3F+http://bit.ly/1bb5ZJ" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Sony+Alpha+A750%3A+did+Sony+Style+leak+details%3F+http://bit.ly/1bb5ZJ" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halloween Photos: Break the Rules to achieve Maximum Interest</title>
		<link>http://alphatracks.com/archives/227</link>
		<comments>http://alphatracks.com/archives/227#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Bonner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first of two parts

Which image says Halloween to you? The image at top was shot with the popup flash on the Sony A350. It us about as sinister as a Mayberry RFD rerun. The bottom photo was shot without flash. It is filled with dark shadows, the white balance is shifted towards orange and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The first of two parts</h3>
<p><img alt="Which image says Halloween to you?" src="http://adventuresindesign.com/minolta/halloween/Halloween-3.jpg" title="Halloween photos" width="450" height="598" />
<p style="width:440px;text-align:left;font-weight:bold;color:#496EB9;">Which image says Halloween to you? The image at top was shot with the popup flash on the Sony A350. It us about as sinister as a Mayberry RFD rerun. The bottom photo was shot without flash. It is filled with dark shadows, the white balance is shifted towards orange and the long exposure caused the people to look blurred. Despite this, the bottom image is the way I think a Halloween photo should look like.  </p>
<p><strong>(Part 1 of 2. Read part 2 at:  <a href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/266">Halloween is a perfect time to try Available Light Photography</a>) Oct. 29, 2009:</strong> There are only a few more days until Halloween. This is an wonderful time to explore the creative side of photography. One-of-a-kind costumes, strange decorations, spooky lights and unearthly backgrounds all provide fantasy fodder for the photographer&#8217;s lens.</p>
<p>Of course most Halloween activity occurs after dark or inside at some sort of party. Under normal circumstances, this is the perfect opportunity to use electronic flash. However, All Hallows Eve is designed to be spooky and mysterious. The cozy, bright illumination you would prefer for holidays such as Thanksgiving and Christmas is out of place for Halloween. So think twice before reaching for that flash unit on October 31.</p>
<h3>If you must use Electronic Flash</h3>
<p>After dark, you may require some artificial light to get an usable shot. Normally, I strongly recommend <a href="http://alphatracks.com/off-camera-flash">off-camera flash</a>. The results are generally much more pleasing. Since this is Halloween, however, rules are made to be broken. I think the hot shoe flash might just be the hot setup.</p>
<p>One of the reasons most photographers dislike direct flash from the hot shoe is the light washes away the shadows, making your subject look lifeless and&#8230;dare I say it&#8230;<em>dead.</em> Hmmm, might this be a perfect light to shoot the <em>undead</em> with?</p>
<p>Another reason most pros shun hot shoe mounted flashes is that placing the flash too close to the lens axis increases the chances of seeing red-eye in your subject. Red-eye is generally a bad thing, but it might actually enhance portraits of creatures such as werewolves and vampires.</p>
<h3>Dragging the Shutter</h3>
<p>If you are shooting with a flash unit, you may wish to experiment with <strong>dragging the shutter</strong>. This term refers to the practice of setting a long time exposure when shooting with a flash. The flash freezes the subject, but the shutter remains open and light toned objects in the background appear as ghostly streaks. Yeah, ghostly. How appropriate.</p>
<p>If you have some willing models, you might flirt with panning after dark. Set your camera up so you are shooting at slow shutter speed, something like 1/8 to 1/15sec. Since you are shooting after dark, this shouldn’t be too difficult. If you try to shoot a pan at longer than 1/8sec, you may find the image will be to blurred to be recognized. Have your model run while you track them with the camera. When you feel you are moving your dSLR at the same rate as the subject, click the shutter and continue to track them until the shutter closes.</p>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 24px"><img src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/spiderman.jpg" alt="Sometimes flash can create interesting high-contrast images. Here the Spiderman costume is brightly lit, while the rest of the background fades to black." title="spiderman" width="180" height="239" class="size-full wp-image-309" />
<p style="width:170px;text-align:left;font-weight:bold;color:#496EB9;">Sometimes flash can create interesting high-contrast images. Here the Spiderman costume is brightly lit, while the rest of the background fades to black.</p>
</div>
<p>You’ll have to guestimate this tracking, since the mirror is up when the shutter is open, so you won’t be able to follow them with the viewfinder. I suggest you try many iterations of this exercise, because it is difficult to get the panning right. Most of these images will probably go directly into the trash can when you see them on your computer, because they will be horribly blurred.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, persistence will usually pay off. At least some of these shots will be outstanding. The idea is to pan the camera at the same speed as the moving subject. If you can do this, your subject will be clear, while the background will be filled with a motion blur.</p>
<p>There is a good chance that your model may be somewhat blurred around the edges, because he or she may be moving at a slightly different speed than you moved the camera. This can actually enhance the image, making the subject look like they are moving at incredible speed. I think you can see how this technique could add interest to your Halloween photos.</p>
<h3>Try the Rear Curtain Sync Mode</h3>
<p>You can shoot panned photos with or without flash. If you do decide to use flash, I suggest you investigate the “Rear Curtain” sync mode on the Sony Alpha.</p>
<p>In the normal mode, your dSLR will fire the flash as soon as the shutter is fully open. Usually that is what you want. When you drag the shutter, any movement after the flash fires will be recorded as streaks of light. If your subject moves, these streaks will appear on top or in front of the subject, making the subject appear to be moving backwards.</p>
<p>In the rear curtain sync mode, the camera fires the flash just before the shutter closes. As a result, the camera records the streaks first, then fully illuminates the subject. The streaks appear behind a moving subject, making the subject appear to be rushing forward.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I suggest you consider dispensing with the flash all together.</p>
<p>In the next installment, I&#8217;ll look into available light Halloween photography.</p>
<p><b>To be continued tomorrow</b></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Halloween+Photos%3A+Break+the+Rules+to+achieve+Maximum+Interest+http://bit.ly/1TQ2Xi" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Halloween+Photos%3A+Break+the+Rules+to+achieve+Maximum+Interest+http://bit.ly/1TQ2Xi" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alphatracks.com/archives/227/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
