<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another Sony A800 rumor &#8212; this dog won&#8217;t hunt!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 03:34:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: car gps system		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[car gps system]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 07:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is no monthly charges.  You can just hook them to your car and use them.  The satellites that they use are the US governments satellites so they can&#039;t charge you to use them.  The only charges would be for extra features such as traffic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no monthly charges.  You can just hook them to your car and use them.  The satellites that they use are the US governments satellites so they can&#8217;t charge you to use them.  The only charges would be for extra features such as traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ATX Power Supply		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ATX Power Supply]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[eye care should always be our top priority since the eye is a very delicate and irreplaceable organ `,*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eye care should always be our top priority since the eye is a very delicate and irreplaceable organ `,*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gracie Hayes		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gracie Hayes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 06:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[eye care is very essential coz you&#039;ll never get a pair of eyes if they got damaged:&quot;:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eye care is very essential coz you&#8217;ll never get a pair of eyes if they got damaged:&#8221;:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: denez		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[denez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve found this Sony Alpha lens roadmap in an italian site: is it real? or is it a fake??





october 2009:

500 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST

400 f/4.5 ST



december 2009:

200 f/2.8

14 f/2.8 fisheye

24-105 f/4



juanuary 2010:

300 f/4 ST

70-210 f/4

24 f/2.8

100 f/2



april 2010:

16-55 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss

24 f/1.4

30 f/1.4

85 f/1.8



october 2010:

200 f/4 macro ST

10-24 f/3.5-4.5

100-300 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss ST

150-450 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST



march 2011:

17-70 f/4

100-300 f/4 ST



november 2011:

400 f/5.6 ST

600 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST

400 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss ST

+ end collaboration with Nikon



(*ST=stabilized, so you can use the SuperSteadyShot or the ST in the lens)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found this Sony Alpha lens roadmap in an italian site: is it real? or is it a fake??</p>
<p>october 2009:</p>
<p>500 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST</p>
<p>400 f/4.5 ST</p>
<p>december 2009:</p>
<p>200 f/2.8</p>
<p>14 f/2.8 fisheye</p>
<p>24-105 f/4</p>
<p>juanuary 2010:</p>
<p>300 f/4 ST</p>
<p>70-210 f/4</p>
<p>24 f/2.8</p>
<p>100 f/2</p>
<p>april 2010:</p>
<p>16-55 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss</p>
<p>24 f/1.4</p>
<p>30 f/1.4</p>
<p>85 f/1.8</p>
<p>october 2010:</p>
<p>200 f/4 macro ST</p>
<p>10-24 f/3.5-4.5</p>
<p>100-300 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss ST</p>
<p>150-450 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST</p>
<p>march 2011:</p>
<p>17-70 f/4</p>
<p>100-300 f/4 ST</p>
<p>november 2011:</p>
<p>400 f/5.6 ST</p>
<p>600 f/4 Carl Zeiss ST</p>
<p>400 f/2.8 Carl Zeiss ST</p>
<p>+ end collaboration with Nikon</p>
<p>(*ST=stabilized, so you can use the SuperSteadyShot or the ST in the lens)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eye care for pets		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7740</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eye care for pets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I typically do not post, I will this time. Thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I typically do not post, I will this time. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dennis		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This ariticle is just too funny....! Great write up.  I think they may release the A800 at a whopping $1,700....if it a full frame? mean the mean while they will release a better model replacement for the A900 &#038; pushing it at a higher price tag. That&#039;s technology today &#038; tomorrow :))]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ariticle is just too funny&#8230;.! Great write up.  I think they may release the A800 at a whopping $1,700&#8230;.if it a full frame? mean the mean while they will release a better model replacement for the A900 &amp; pushing it at a higher price tag. That&#8217;s technology today &amp; tomorrow :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a88-rumors/#comment-7738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/146#comment-7738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I too would like to believe this is true, but have a hard time seeing the logic in it... at least for the next year or so.  The biggest problem I see with an A700 replacement is the pricing of the A380.  With just a single kit lens, that camera is already almost $900.  I can&#039;t see Sony releasing another camera at nearly the same price with a huge jump in features.



I mean, to look at these specs... it is hard to believe this camera could be built at any price, much less for under $2k.  GPS and wifi?  8 frames per second?  Full frame 16mp sensor with HD video?  Basically, it is like someone just made a checklist of what they would like to see in their dream camera.



I would also be curious to see where the rumored A500 and A550 fit into this as well.  Maybe these are yet another iteration of the 300 series with video?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would like to believe this is true, but have a hard time seeing the logic in it&#8230; at least for the next year or so.  The biggest problem I see with an A700 replacement is the pricing of the A380.  With just a single kit lens, that camera is already almost $900.  I can&#8217;t see Sony releasing another camera at nearly the same price with a huge jump in features.</p>
<p>I mean, to look at these specs&#8230; it is hard to believe this camera could be built at any price, much less for under $2k.  GPS and wifi?  8 frames per second?  Full frame 16mp sensor with HD video?  Basically, it is like someone just made a checklist of what they would like to see in their dream camera.</p>
<p>I would also be curious to see where the rumored A500 and A550 fit into this as well.  Maybe these are yet another iteration of the 300 series with video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
