<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Future Sony Alpha Advanced Amateur model in the wild?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://alphatracks.com/future-sony-alpha-advanced-amateur-model-in-the-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://alphatracks.com/future-sony-alpha-advanced-amateur-model-in-the-wild/</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: -mAoz-		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/future-sony-alpha-advanced-amateur-model-in-the-wild/#comment-1913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[-mAoz-]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/52#comment-1913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m preety shure it is no a fake. I don&#039;t know any promo image of this camera in this angle and in this kind of lightning. It also looks too good to be fake (but not too good to be true).

I believe the scond option is the right one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m preety shure it is no a fake. I don&#8217;t know any promo image of this camera in this angle and in this kind of lightning. It also looks too good to be fake (but not too good to be true).</p>
<p>I believe the scond option is the right one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mezman		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/future-sony-alpha-advanced-amateur-model-in-the-wild/#comment-1912</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mezman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/52#comment-1912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think what damns this to the pile of fakes is the aperture of the lens.  It&#039;s surely a Zeiss lens because of the OOF orange &quot;T*&quot; on the lens.  But the aperture in the lens looks like it&#039;s stopped all the way down, like the lenses in the mockups at PMA.  No way that the DOF would be so shallow with a lens that close and that stopped down.  This all leads me to believe that this is a non-functional mockup without a real lens mount and someone else took the picture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what damns this to the pile of fakes is the aperture of the lens.  It&#8217;s surely a Zeiss lens because of the OOF orange &#8220;T*&#8221; on the lens.  But the aperture in the lens looks like it&#8217;s stopped all the way down, like the lenses in the mockups at PMA.  No way that the DOF would be so shallow with a lens that close and that stopped down.  This all leads me to believe that this is a non-functional mockup without a real lens mount and someone else took the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
