<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rosacea cream		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rosacea cream]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m recent here, and only desire to say hello!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m recent here, and only desire to say hello!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Full frame sensor with image stabilization: another perspective &#124; Alphatracks		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Full frame sensor with image stabilization: another perspective &#124; Alphatracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] http://alphatracks.com/archives/82 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/82" rel="ugc">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Encoria		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Encoria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent webforum!

http://srubibablo.com

 Wow! Good resources here, Enjoyed the visit!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent webforum!</p>
<p><a href="http://srubibablo.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://srubibablo.com</a></p>
<p> Wow! Good resources here, Enjoyed the visit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A700 battery life analyzed by engineer &#124; Alphatracks		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A700 battery life analyzed by engineer &#124; Alphatracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Bart Pasquale, who last appeared on these pages with his insightful comments on the Sony Alpha Full Fame - Antishake question, is back with a detailed analysis of the Sony battery for the A700 Alpha and it&#8217;s lack of compatibility with the A100 batteries. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bart Pasquale, who last appeared on these pages with his insightful comments on the Sony Alpha Full Fame &#8211; Antishake question, is back with a detailed analysis of the Sony battery for the A700 Alpha and it&#8217;s lack of compatibility with the A100 batteries. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Blaise		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3270</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Blaise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I already HAVE a Minolta full frame anti-shake digital SLR!



... er, SL-TTL-EVF*.  Here&#039;s the details:



Note that the Minolta DiMage 7, 7i, 7ug, 7hi series had matching lens-to-sensor coverage - full frame.  Okay, not 35 mm frame, but full-frame matching lens and sensor nonetheless.



Then, later, the exact same lens plus capture sensor size appeared in the Minolta DiMage A1 with sensor-based anti-shake.



Minolta used a severe (+4%?) corner fall-off / vignette compensation filter, but I believe they use it on the entire series - see



http://www.dalibor.cz/minolta/plugin_user_guide.htm



for a sample quote from Dalibor Jelinik:



&quot;...Normally the highest number of a pixel captured is 3,965. But the camera occasionally captures a picture whose maximum value is higher then 3,965, up to 4,095. This is to allow for &quot;vignetting compensation&quot; that occurs when shooting with an aperture of f/2.8. Yes, the camera vignettes at this aperture. The vignetting is hard to see in the corners because the camera multiplies based on a mask to brighten the corner pixels. After this compensation there might be some pixels with values greater than 3,965 (those are the pixels in the corners that were close to maximum before multiplication based on the mask)...&quot;



So, I&#039;m happy with the thought of a Sony Alpha full-35-mm frame SSS anti-shake system, even selectable such that I know that



ON = AS+corner-compensation-filter,



OFF = no filter, for purists.



* SL-TTL-EVF = single lens through the lens electronic viewfinder, an SLR without the R.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already HAVE a Minolta full frame anti-shake digital SLR!</p>
<p>&#8230; er, SL-TTL-EVF*.  Here&#8217;s the details:</p>
<p>Note that the Minolta DiMage 7, 7i, 7ug, 7hi series had matching lens-to-sensor coverage &#8211; full frame.  Okay, not 35 mm frame, but full-frame matching lens and sensor nonetheless.</p>
<p>Then, later, the exact same lens plus capture sensor size appeared in the Minolta DiMage A1 with sensor-based anti-shake.</p>
<p>Minolta used a severe (+4%?) corner fall-off / vignette compensation filter, but I believe they use it on the entire series &#8211; see</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dalibor.cz/minolta/plugin_user_guide.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.dalibor.cz/minolta/plugin_user_guide.htm</a></p>
<p>for a sample quote from Dalibor Jelinik:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Normally the highest number of a pixel captured is 3,965. But the camera occasionally captures a picture whose maximum value is higher then 3,965, up to 4,095. This is to allow for &#8220;vignetting compensation&#8221; that occurs when shooting with an aperture of f/2.8. Yes, the camera vignettes at this aperture. The vignetting is hard to see in the corners because the camera multiplies based on a mask to brighten the corner pixels. After this compensation there might be some pixels with values greater than 3,965 (those are the pixels in the corners that were close to maximum before multiplication based on the mask)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m happy with the thought of a Sony Alpha full-35-mm frame SSS anti-shake system, even selectable such that I know that</p>
<p>ON = AS+corner-compensation-filter,</p>
<p>OFF = no filter, for purists.</p>
<p>* SL-TTL-EVF = single lens through the lens electronic viewfinder, an SLR without the R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: More on the Sony Alpha full frame with anti-shake rumours &#124; Alphatracks		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More on the Sony Alpha full frame with anti-shake rumours &#124; Alphatracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &#171; Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &laquo; Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: warren massey		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3268</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[warren massey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom,



I am not an engineer of any type! I donâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />t know how the SSS stuff works beyond what I have read here and other sites.



I read Bertâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />s comments and it made sense but I have one question about sensor size that I have never seen addressed.  Why canâ€<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/15.0.3/72x72/2122.png" alt="™" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />t we have a sensor slightly larger then full frame so that no matter where the circle falls it is on the sensor and the camera can auto crop the area not used?



Just a thought from someone that has no idea what happens between when I press the shutter release and when I pull my CF card out!  LOL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>I am not an engineer of any type! I donâ€™t know how the SSS stuff works beyond what I have read here and other sites.</p>
<p>I read Bertâ€™s comments and it made sense but I have one question about sensor size that I have never seen addressed.  Why canâ€™t we have a sensor slightly larger then full frame so that no matter where the circle falls it is on the sensor and the camera can auto crop the area not used?</p>
<p>Just a thought from someone that has no idea what happens between when I press the shutter release and when I pull my CF card out!  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Teriiehina.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Air Esse Esse		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teriiehina.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Air Esse Esse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] L&#8217;AS possible en FF ? Presque. Bon, Ã§a, Ã§a n&#8217;intÃ©ressera que Patrick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] L&#8217;AS possible en FF ? Presque. Bon, Ã§a, Ã§a n&#8217;intÃ©ressera que Patrick [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Can Sony build a true full frame dSLR? &#124; Alphatracks		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3266</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Sony build a true full frame dSLR? &#124; Alphatracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &#171; Senior Sony Alpha manager interviewed at hardwarezone.com Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question &#187; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &laquo; Senior Sony Alpha manager interviewed at hardwarezone.com Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question &raquo; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Playstation &#187; Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/optical-expert-addresses-the-sony-full-frame-slr-question/#comment-3265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Playstation &#187; Optical expert addresses the Sony full-frame SLR question]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/82#comment-3265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Mark wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week, I posted about the alleged difficulty of using a full-frame sensor with the Sony/Minolta anti-shake system. I made critical error in my post, when I suggested that the sensor had room to move up and down but not side to side. &#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Mark wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptLast week, I posted about the alleged difficulty of using a full-frame sensor with the Sony/Minolta anti-shake system. I made critical error in my post, when I suggested that the sensor had room to move up and down but not side to side. &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
