<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:53:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Payday Loan		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/#comment-2448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Payday Loan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My son and I concur with your ingenious conjecture relating to nounces new 12.47MP sensor &#124; Alphatracks. The passage might be really significant specifically to people of Tahoka !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son and I concur with your ingenious conjecture relating to nounces new 12.47MP sensor | Alphatracks. The passage might be really significant specifically to people of Tahoka !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nikon D3 and D300 provide clues about new Sony Alphas &#124; Alphatracks		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/#comment-2447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikon D3 and D300 provide clues about new Sony Alphas &#124; Alphatracks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 03:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &#171; Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Alphatracks Minolta and Sony SLR Weblog      &laquo; Sony announces new 12.47MP sensor: can new dSLR be far behind? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Houckster		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/#comment-2446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Houckster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The extra pixels that Sony&#039;s new processor provides is a nice feature but the biggest problem I have with the Alpha 100 is the image viewing screen which is virtually useless except in the shade and that&#039;s not always convenient.  It also needs finer detail for adjudging the sharpness of the image.



A second shortcoming is the reduced exposure latitude compared to film, even slides.



A couple of years ago, I was dead certain a FF image sensor was necessary.  Now, I really couldn&#039;t care less.  Even the A100 is delivering nice crisp 8.5x11 pictures that are indistinguishable, sharpnesswise, from Kodachrome shots.  Besides, my lenses, all new Tamrons, are optimized for the APS-C sensor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extra pixels that Sony&#8217;s new processor provides is a nice feature but the biggest problem I have with the Alpha 100 is the image viewing screen which is virtually useless except in the shade and that&#8217;s not always convenient.  It also needs finer detail for adjudging the sharpness of the image.</p>
<p>A second shortcoming is the reduced exposure latitude compared to film, even slides.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago, I was dead certain a FF image sensor was necessary.  Now, I really couldn&#8217;t care less.  Even the A100 is delivering nice crisp 8.5&#215;11 pictures that are indistinguishable, sharpnesswise, from Kodachrome shots.  Besides, my lenses, all new Tamrons, are optimized for the APS-C sensor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris TM		</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-announces-new-1247mp-sensor-can-new-dslr-be-far-behind/#comment-2445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris TM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/archives/62#comment-2445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve hit the nail on the head. If I had a wishlist for the new dslrs from Sony, it would be Canon comparable noise reduction at high ISOs, a much, much quieter shutter and much better focusing in low-light conditions. Hopefully, they will deliver. A full frame sensor would be nice too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head. If I had a wishlist for the new dslrs from Sony, it would be Canon comparable noise reduction at high ISOs, a much, much quieter shutter and much better focusing in low-light conditions. Hopefully, they will deliver. A full frame sensor would be nice too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
