<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DSLR Archives - Alphatracks</title>
	<atom:link href="https://alphatracks.com/category/minolta/dslr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://alphatracks.com/category/minolta/dslr/</link>
	<description>Sony and Minolta SLR Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Mirrorless vs dSLR Cameras in poor Light: the EVIL avantage</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/mirrorless-vs-dslr-cameras/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/mirrorless-vs-dslr-cameras/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A350]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manual Focus SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A-mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evil Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Adapter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rokkor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://alphatracks.com/?p=2601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Mirrorless vs dSLR Cameras in poor Light How does a twelve-year-old dSLR compare to the...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/mirrorless-vs-dslr-cameras/">Mirrorless vs dSLR Cameras in poor Light: the EVIL avantage</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Mirrorless vs dSLR Cameras in poor Light</h2>
<p><span id="p992">How does a twelve-year-old <span id="1102" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span> <span id="1955-1956">compare</span> to the modern crop of mirrorless cameras?</span><span id="p993"><span id="1105" class="s-bl-t"> This</span> <span id="1834-1835">time</span> <span id="1217" class="s-ja-t">around</span>, I will be <span id="1957-1958">comparing</span> a <span id="1103" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span> from 2008 to a modern <a href="https://alphatracks.com/dslr-photography-basics/what-is-an-evil-camera/">Evil camera</a>.</span><span id="p994"> Spoiler alert, unlike the <span id="1836-1837">movies</span>, Evil wins this one.</span></p>
<p><span id="p995">While creating sample images for <span id="1131">my</span> <a href="https://alphatracks.com/rokkor-58mm/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span id="1106" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span> 58mm f/1.4 review</a>, I found myself shooting test shots of a high-energy worship service with <span id="1132">my</span> aging Sony <span id="1107" class="s-rg-t">A350</span> <span id="1108" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span>.</span><span id="p996"> </span></p>
<p><span id="p1967">Trying to focus in the faint light proved quite challenging.</span><span id="p1968"> I recall obtaining excellent photos with this camera in the past.</span><span id="p999"> <span id="1159">Same</span> camera, <span id="1160">same</span> lighting conditions.</span><span id="p1000"> The <span id="1716-1717">images</span> from 2010 were sharp and clear.</span><span id="p1969"> Why did I have so much difficulty in 2022?</span></p>
<p><span id="p1002"><span id="1166" class="s-ja-t">Then</span> <span id="1110">I</span> <span id="1165-1844-1845" class="s-ja-t">realized</span> that when <span id="1111">I</span> <span id="1846-1847">shot</span> with the <span id="1057" class="s-rg-t">A350</span> a <span id="1720-1721">decade</span> ago, my <span id="1140-1722-1723">lenses</span> of <span id="1724-1725">choice</span> <span id="1848-1849">were</span> <span id="1058" class="s-rg-t">Minolta</span> <span id="1059" class="s-rg-t">A-Mount</span> autofocus <span id="1141">lenses</span>.</span><span id="p1003"> Sporadically, <span id="1112">I</span> would <span id="1168-1850-1851" class="s-ja-t">use</span> an <span id="1726">adapter</span> to <span id="1852">mount</span> one of my <span id="1167" class="s-ja-t">old</span> <span id="1060" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span> <span id="1142">lenses</span>.</span><span id="p1004"> But generally, <span id="1113">I</span> would only break out the <span id="1061" class="s-rg-t">Rokkors</span> in good lighting.</span><span id="p1005"> When the <span id="1727-1728">lighting</span> started to <span id="1853">fade</span>, <span id="1114">I</span> would switch back to an autofocus lens.</span></p>
<h2>The rise of the E-Mount and EVF</h2>
<p><span id="p1006"><span id="1115">I</span> <span id="1854-1855">bought</span> my first <span id="1062-1729-1730" class="s-rg-t">E-Mount</span><span id="1729-1730"> </span><span id="1145-1729-1730">camera</span>, a Sony <span id="1063" class="s-rg-t">NEX-5n</span>, in 2012.</span><span id="p1007"> <span id="1116">I</span> never expected it would become my primary <span id="1146">camera</span>. </span><span id="p1008"><span id="1066"> </span><span id="1066-1117">I</span> had no idea at the <span id="1731-1732">time</span> that the <span id="1064">E-Mount</span> mirrorless designs would eventually evolve into Sony&#8217;s top-of-the-line <span id="1147">camera</span>s.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1009">My <span id="1733-1734">idea</span> <span id="1858-1859">was</span> to experiment with the new mount.</span><span id="p1010"> <span id="1118">I</span> was <span id="1173" class="s-ja-t">especially</span> keen on reusing my <span id="1171" class="s-ja-t">old</span> <span id="1067" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span> lenses on the <span id="1172" class="s-ja-t">new</span> &#8220;evil&#8221; camera.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1011"><span id="1175" class="s-ja-t">Fast</span> <span id="1174" class="s-ja-t">forward</span> ten <span id="1735-1736">years</span> and <span id="1119">I</span> couldn&#8217;t recall when <span id="1120">I</span>&#8216;d last used a <span id="1068" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span>, including the <span id="1069" class="s-rg-t">A350</span>.</span><span id="p1012"> <span id="1121">I</span> <span id="1860-1861">have</span> nothing against <span id="1070" class="s-rg-t">dSLRs</span>, but mirrorless cameras are much more useful, <span id="1176" class="s-ja-t">especially</span> when using <span id="1133">my</span> old manual-focus <span id="1071" class="s-rg-t">Rokkors</span>.</span></p>
<h2>Why an Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) is More Desirable for Manual Focus Lenses.</h2>
<p><span id="p1013"><span id="1134">My</span> current main camera <span id="1862-1863">is</span> the Sony <span id="1072" class="s-bl-t">A7s and</span> <span id="1122">I</span> <span id="1864-1865">carry</span> an <span id="1073" class="s-rg-t">A6000</span> as a <span id="1737">backup</span>.</span><span id="p1014"> <span id="1738-1739">Thanks</span> to the Electronic Viewfinder on both, <span id="1123">I</span> can easily compose and <span id="1866-1867">focus</span> with all of <span id="1135">my</span> <span id="1177" class="s-ja-t">old</span> manual-focus lenses, even in poorly lit situations.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1015"><span id="1124">I</span> have customized a <span id="1740-1741">button</span> on <span id="1136">my</span> mirrorless cameras to instantly magnify the <span id="1742">preview</span> in the viewfinder.</span><span id="p1016"> This <span id="1868-1869">allows</span> me to effortlessly rack the <span id="1148-1743-1744">focus</span> to <span id="1221-1870-1871">obtain</span> needlelike sharpness.</span><span id="p1017"> F<span id="1074-1149-1745-1746" class="s-or-t">ocus</span> <span id="1872">peaking</span> is always enabled as well.</span><span id="p1018"> The <span id="1747-1748">combination</span> of magnification and <span id="1150-1749-1750">focus</span> <span id="1873">peaking</span> <span id="1874-1875">makes</span> my ancient <span id="1075" class="s-rg-t">Rokkors</span> compare very favorably with modern lenses.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1019">It <span id="1876-1877">is</span> <span id="1180" class="s-ja-t">second</span> nature for me to <span id="1878-1879">use</span> these EV tools to <span id="1222-1880-1881">obtain</span> <span id="1181" class="s-ja-t">great</span> results.</span><span id="p1020"> The <span id="1751-1752">fact</span> the EV can also increase the <span id="1753-1754">brightness</span> of the <span id="1755">preview</span> <span id="1183-1882-1883" class="s-ja-t">is</span> another <span id="1182" class="s-ja-t">major</span> advantage in murky light.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1021"><span id="1125">I</span> had forgotten just how much <span id="1126">I</span> had <span id="1884-1885">depended</span> on these focus aids.</span><span id="p1022"> It was <span id="1076-1184" class="s-or s-ja-t">nearly</span><span id="1076" class="s-or-t"> impossible</span> to <span id="1886-1887">focus</span> the <span id="1077" class="s-rg-t">A350</span> in the lackluster illumination.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1023"><span id="1127">I</span> <span id="1185" class="s-ja-t">truly</span> missed my <span id="1078" class="s-rg-t">A7s</span> with its bright, <span id="1079" class="s-rg-t">easy-to-magnify</span> electronic viewfinder.</span></p>
<h2>Modern cameras also feature great ISO performance</h2>
<p><span id="p1024"><span id="1187-p1024-pv" class="s-ja-t">Of </span><span id="1187-1756-1757-p1024-pv" class="s-ja-t">course</span><span id="p1024-pv">, the </span><span id="1080-p1024-pv" class="s-rg-t">A7s</span><span id="p1024-pv">, with its high </span><span id="1153-p1024-pv">ISO</span><span id="p1024-pv"> capabilities, </span><span id="1888-1889-p1024-pv">provides</span><span id="p1024-pv"> another </span><span id="1186-p1024-pv" class="s-ja-t">major</span><span id="p1024-pv"> advantage.</span></span><span id="p1025"> An <span id="1154">ISO</span> of 800 <span id="1890-1891">is</span> about the <span id="1758-1759">top</span> of the <span id="1081" class="s-rg-t">A350</span>&#8216;s useable sensitivity, and I am more comfortable with 400.</span><span id="p1026"> Image noise is unacceptable at any higher <span id="1155">ISO</span> settings.</span><span id="p1027"> In <span id="1760-1761">contrast</span>, with the <span id="1082" class="s-bl-t">A7s I</span> can <span id="1892-1893">shoot</span> at <span id="1156">ISO</span> 3200, confidently knowing noise won&#8217;t <span id="1189" class="s-ja-t">be</span> a <span id="1762-1763">factor</span>.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1028"><span id="1190" class="s-ja-t">Of </span><span id="1190-1764-1765" class="s-ja-t">course</span>, a higher <span id="1157">ISO</span> won&#8217;t affect the <span id="1766-1767">brightness</span> in a <span id="1083" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span> viewfinder.</span><span id="p1029"> But a higher <span id="1158">ISO</span> permits extra depth of <span id="1768-1769">field</span>, which increases the <span id="1770-1771">chances</span> of <span id="1191-1894-1895" class="s-ja-t">getting</span> the <span id="1772-1773">subject</span> in decent focus.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1030">I <span id="1896-1897">struggled</span> to <span id="1193-1898-1899" class="s-ja-t">get</span> acceptable photos with the <span id="1084" class="s-rg-t">A350</span> in the meager light <span id="1192" class="s-ja-t">available</span> to me.</span><span id="p1031"> With the <span id="1085" class="s-rg-t">A7s</span>, <span id="1128">I</span> can magnify the <span id="1774-1775">focus</span> to clearly <span id="1223">discern</span> <span id="1776-1777">details</span> <span id="1162">such as</span> eyelashes and <span id="1194" class="s-ja-t">fine</span> hairs.</span><span id="p1032"> The <span id="1778-1779">lack</span> of <span id="1780-1781">light</span> in the <span id="1782">auditorium</span> <span id="1900-1901">made it</span> next to impossible to <span id="1902-1903">find</span> focus with the <span id="1086" class="s-rg-t">A350</span>.</span><span id="p1033"> </span></p>
<p><span id="p1034"><span id="1129">I</span> don&#8217;t <span id="1087" class="s-rg-t">remember ever</span> being as frustrated as a <span id="1783-1784">photographer</span> as <span id="1130">I</span> <span id="1904-1905">was</span> that <span id="1785-1786">day</span>.</span><span id="p1035"> <span id="1906-1907">Attempting</span> to <span id="1195-1908-1909" class="s-ja-t">make</span> adequate images with my manual focus lens <span id="1196-1910-1911" class="s-ja-t">was</span> a discouraging ordeal.</span><span id="p1036"> It was <span id="1198" class="s-ja-t">especially</span> <span id="1088" class="s-rg-t">dishearting</span> to <span id="1912-1913">capture</span> a <span id="1224">stunning</span> facial expression only to <span id="1914-1915">discover</span> the overall <span id="1787-1788">image</span> was shapelessly <span id="1197" class="s-ja-t">soft</span>.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1037">As you might <span id="1916-1917">expect</span>, I <span id="1200-1918-1919" class="s-ja-t">saw</span> a <span id="1199" class="s-ja-t">huge</span> decrease in the <span id="1789-1790">number</span> of satisfactory shots <span id="1920-1921">taken</span> with the <span id="1089" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span>.</span><span id="p1038"> Once I imported them onto my computer, a disappointingly <span id="1201" class="s-ja-t">high</span> number of the <span id="1791-1792">images</span> <span id="1202" class="s-ja-t">just</span> missed being acceptable. My eyes hurt as they tried to resolve edges that <span id="p1040">were <span id="1204" class="s-ja-t">almost</span>, but not quite, sharp.</span></span><span id="p1039"></span><span id="p1040"></span></p>
<p><span id="p1041">I was <span id="1205" class="s-ja-t">able</span> to salvage a <span id="1803">handful</span> of <span id="1804-1805">photos</span>.</span><span id="p1042"> Some were <span id="1207" class="s-ja-t">actually</span> in <span id="1206" class="s-ja-t">sharp</span> focus, more by <span id="1806-1807">luck</span> than <span id="1808-1809">skill</span>.</span><span id="p1043"> I was <span id="1208" class="s-ja-t">able</span> to <span id="1931-1932">manipulate</span> some of the near-misses into <span id="1226">tolerable</span> photographs <span id="1933-1934">using</span> Lightroom&#8217;s Sharpening and Noise Reduction filters.</span><span id="p1044"> I <span id="1227">trashed</span> <span id="1810-1811">most</span> of the <span id="1812-1813">rest</span>.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1045">You shouldn&#8217;t interpret this as a <span id="1209" class="s-ja-t">blanket</span> condemnation of using an <span id="1814">adapter</span> to <span id="1935">mount</span> <span id="1090-1815-1816" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span><span id="1815-1816"> images</span> on older <span id="1091" class="s-rg-t">dSLRs</span>.</span><span id="p1046"> I <span id="1936-1937">captured</span> a <span id="1817-1818">number</span> of tack-sharp photos in good light.</span><span id="p1047"> It was only when the <span id="1819-1820">light</span> started to <span id="1143-1938">fade</span> that the <span id="1821-1822">number</span> of <span id="1210" class="s-ja-t">acceptable</span> results from the <span id="1092" class="s-rg-t">A350</span>/<span id="1093-1823-1824" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span><span id="1823-1824"> combination</span> <span id="1144">faded</span> as well.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1048">In the current digital camera landscape, the <span id="1094" class="s-rg-t">A350</span> <span id="1939-1940">is</span> a <span id="1825-1826">dinosaur</span>.</span><span id="p1049"> It is still <span id="1211" class="s-ja-t">usable</span>, but its <span id="1827-1828">capabilities</span> are easily outstripped by any modern <span id="1095" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span>.</span><span id="p1050"> <span id="1151">Even so</span>, I <span id="1941-1942">suspect</span> that the latest ground-glass and mirror cameras would struggle with manual focusing in <span id="1228">mediocre</span> light. When it comes to seeing in the dark, dSLRs cannot compete with modern electronic viewfinders.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1051">I <span id="1214" class="s-ja-t">am</span> <span id="1213" class="s-ja-t">still</span> a <span id="1212" class="s-ja-t">big</span> proponent of shooting with classic manual focus lenses on modern cameras.</span><span id="p1052"> A-mount <span id="1097" class="s-rg-t">dSLRs</span> are tricker because the <span id="1098-1829" class="s-rg-t">Rokkor</span><span id="1829"> adapter</span> <span id="1229-1945-1946">requires</span> an extra internal lens element.</span><span id="p1053"><span id="1100" class="s-bl-t"> But</span> that hasn&#8217;t <span id="1215" class="s-ja-t">stopped</span> me from <span id="1216-1947-1948" class="s-ja-t">creating</span> lovely images with this <span id="1830-1831">combination</span>.</span></p>
<p><span id="p1054">Ordinarily, I <span id="1949-1950">am</span> usually comfortable shooting with either a mirrorless camera or a <span id="1101" class="s-rg-t">dSLR</span>.</span><span id="p1966"> When the lights go down, however, I have learned a mirrorless camera has some distinct advantages.</span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/mirrorless-vs-dslr-cameras/">Mirrorless vs dSLR Cameras in poor Light: the EVIL avantage</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/mirrorless-vs-dslr-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony posts Firmware 2.0 for Sony A900 and A850</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-posts-firmware-2-0-for-sony-a900-and-a850/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/sony-posts-firmware-2-0-for-sony-a900-and-a850/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=1003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A free firmware update for Sony A900 and A850 dSLRs improves auto focus speed, increases the bracket range and expands exposure compensation scope.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-posts-firmware-2-0-for-sony-a900-and-a850/">Sony posts Firmware 2.0 for Sony A900 and A850</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it during the Christmas rush, Sony has posted a firmware update for the A900 and A850 full-frame dSLRs.</p>
<p>Sony claims Version 2.0 of the firmware increase auto-focus speed (varying by lens), adds an improved bracket setting that offers Exposure Variation of 3.0 (opposed the the 2 EV provided by version 1.0 firmware) and expands exposure compensation range to plus or minus 5 EV.</p>
<p>In all, it seems like its well worth upgrading the firmware. A850</p>
<div style="width: 325px; float: left;">
<figure id="attachment_1004" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-1004" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-1004" title="SONY_A850" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/SONY_A850-300x289.PNG" alt="Faster auto-focus, expanded exposure compensation and greater bracketing range is available for Sony A900 and A850 owners through a firmware upgrade." width="300" height="289" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-1004" class="wp-caption-text">Faster auto-focus, expanded exposure compensation and greater bracketing range is available for Sony A900 and A850 owners through a firmware upgrade.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>US shooters can obtain the 2.0 firmware by going to the <a href="http://bit.ly/fXeFCY" target="_blank">Sony Alpha support site</a> then searching for their specific camera model and computer operating system.  Although both the A900 and A850 can be upgraded to 2.0, you need to download the proper updater for your specific camera model.</p>
<p>In Europe, Sony A900 and A850 shooters can obtain the update at the <a href="http://bit.ly/hniQf6." target="_blank" class="broken_link">Sony Europe site</a>.</p>
<p>Sony advises users to match the upgrade to their particular model and geographic location. What would happen if you applied a A900 firmware upgrade to an A850 or installed the US version on a European camera? Maybe nothing, or maybe the installer would refuse to make the upgrade. Considering that a faulty firmware upgrade could potentially render your camera unusable, you need to follow Sony&#8217;s instructions and make sure the upgrade you install matches your camera.</p>
<p>It is nice to see that Sony is continuing to support their high-end flasgship models.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-posts-firmware-2-0-for-sony-a900-and-a850/">Sony posts Firmware 2.0 for Sony A900 and A850</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/sony-posts-firmware-2-0-for-sony-a900-and-a850/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony breaks mold with new A55 and A33 Translucent Mirror Cameras</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-breaks-mold-with-new-a55-and-a33-translucent-mirror-cameras/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/sony-breaks-mold-with-new-a55-and-a33-translucent-mirror-cameras/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A33]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translucent Mirror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video dSLR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sony's new A55 and A33 dSLR cameras use translucent mirror technology to provide fast video auto-focus capabilities that conventional Video dSLR's cannot match.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-breaks-mold-with-new-a55-and-a33-translucent-mirror-cameras/">Sony breaks mold with new A55 and A33 Translucent Mirror Cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-892 alignright" title="Sony_Alpha_SLT-1" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-11-300x226.jpg" alt="Sony_Alpha_SLT-1" width="300" height="226" /><strong>Aug 23, 2010</strong> Sony Alpha cameras are in the news in a big way, thanks to a flurry of announcements about their high-end dSLR and Translucent Mirror cameras.</p>
<p>Translucent what? Sony has announced the <strong><a title="Sony Style Website (USA)" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644743999&amp;N=4294951742#/panel_prod1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="broken_link">A55</a></strong><a title="Sony Style Website (USA)" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644743999&amp;N=4294951742#/panel_prod1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="broken_link"> and </a><strong><a title="Sony Style Website (USA)" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644743999&amp;N=4294951742#/panel_prod1" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="broken_link">A33</a></strong> cameras, which look like conventional dSLRs&#8230;but are actually a form of Pellix Mirror cameras.</p>
<p>Although the concept of a Pellix or half-mirror camera has been around for decades, Sony has adapted the translucent mirror concept to a modern electronic viewfinder to create a whole new animal.</p>
<p>The implications of utilizing this system in the Sony Alpha are quite exciting. The biggest benefit involves shooting video, since the Pellix technology allows the camera to maintain fast autofocus while shooting, eliminating a limitation that plagues dSLR video cameras from other manufacturers.</p>
<p>The translucent mirror uses beam-spliting technology to direct some light to the focusing sensor, while the rest of the light passes directly through the mirror to the imaging capture sensor. Thus the A55 and A33 can use fast phase-detection auto focus, even when shooting video.</p>
<p>To date other most other dSLRs handle the focusing issue by not offering auto focusing at all, or using slower Passive autofocus.</p>
<p>While I suspect that solving video issues is the main reason Sony has chosen to go down this road, there are several other advantages that photographers can look forward to in Sony Alpha translucent mirror cameras.</p>
<p>Because the mirror doesn&#8217;t need to flip up for each shot, the cameras is able to deliver faster frame rates. In the 1970s, Canon produced a high-speed motor-driven version of the  F1 film SLR equipped with a pellix mirror. It was specifically aimed at sports and technical photographers looking for high-speed capture.</p>
<p>Because of the non-moving, translucent mirror, the Sony A55 can shoot at 10fps, an outstanding frame rate for a dSLR priced under $800. (US price is $749.)</p>
<p>Secondly, the Pelilx camera should be much quieter. Typically, shutter noise isn&#8217;t a big issue, but there are times when the noise generated by that flipping mirror can be objectionable. Shutter noise can negatively impact wedding ceremonies, speeches, training classes, undercover surveillance, wildlife photo shoots and other quiet events. I love shooting with my Sony Alpha dSLRs, but I keep an old Minolta Dimage 7i around because it can shoot in absolute silence. I don&#8217;t use it often, but I have captured images I never would have gotten because of the noise of a conventional SLR or dSLR would have interrupted the proceedings.</p>
<p>Finally, the photographer can follow fast action without the mirror blacking out the scene each time the shutter fires. In fact, the viewfinder will never black out,  since the mirror will always be projecting light to the viewfinder, even when the shutter is open.</p>
<p>Sounds great, you say. Sign me up.</p>
<p>Before you get too enamored about the translucent system, there are good reasons you don&#8217;t see too many Pellix cameras on the market.</p>
<p>First that beam-splitting technology means the sensor and viewfinder have to share the available light. In bright sunlight it isn&#8217;t a problem, but as the illumination fades, any light reflected to the viewfinder must be subtracted from the light falling on the sensor. As a result, Pellix cameras are not known for their stellar  low-light performance.</p>
<p>Sony has solved this problem by replacing the conventional optical viewfinder with an electronic viewfinder (EVF). (There is also a live-view LCD on the back.)</p>
<p>When you look through the eye-piece on a Alpha A55 or A33, you will actually be looking an electronic viewfinder &#8212; a feature  the aforementioned DiMage 7i offered a decade or so ago. There is one big difference. The EVF in the old 7i was prone to smearing if the camera or subject moved quickly. I haven&#8217;t yet had a chance to play with a A55 or A33, but the newer EVF cameras I&#8217;ve used recently rival an optical viewfinder in refresh speed. Hopefully the new Sony models will have a similar high-performance EVF.</p>
<p>Because the EVF can amplify the signal in the viewfinder, we can expect that the view from the finder in the new cameras will be bright and clear in dim light, something that could not be said about old-scholl half-mirror cameras.</p>
<p>A third possible drawback involves dust on the mirror. In current dSLR designs, dust on the mirror is meaningless. Dust on the sensor is a concern, but anything on the mirror has no effect on the final image.</p>
<p>Since pellix style camera actually shoot through the mirror, however, crud on the mirror could reduce image quality.</p>
<p>I have no experience with pellix mirrors, but I am told that they are usually quite delicate. Will it be easy to keep the translucent mirror dust-free? Is the mirror easy to clean? Only time will tell.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite excited by the new Translucent cameras, and might just pickup one of these in the near future. Of course there are other items that must be budgeted for. Sony has also announced two new conventional dSLRs (with video capabilities) and three new lenses. I&#8217;ll discuss those in my next post.</p>
<p>The <a title="Sony A55 at SonyStyle" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644744001" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="broken_link">Sony Alpha A55</a> is available for pre-order for $749.00 at Sony Style</p>
<p>The <a title="A33 at SonyStyle" href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644744000" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="broken_link">Sony Alpha A33</a> is avialable for pre-order for $649.00 at Sony Style</p>
<p>These are the body-only prices. The A55 and A33 use the complete range of Sony and <a href="http://alphatracks.com/archives/836">Minolta A-Mount lenses</a>.</p>

<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-111.jpg'><img decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-111-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-311.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-311-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-411.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-411-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-511.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-511-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-611.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-611-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-711.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-711-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-811.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-811-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>
<a href='https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-211.jpg'><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="150" height="150" src="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sony_Alpha_SLT-211-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail size-thumbnail" alt="" /></a>

<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-breaks-mold-with-new-a55-and-a33-translucent-mirror-cameras/">Sony breaks mold with new A55 and A33 Translucent Mirror Cameras</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/sony-breaks-mold-with-new-a55-and-a33-translucent-mirror-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alpha A390 and A290: new Sony dSLR models</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/alpha-a390-and-a290-new-sony-dslr-models/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/alpha-a390-and-a290-new-sony-dslr-models/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A290]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A390]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Sony dSLR factory will soon be cranking out two new entry-level models: the A290 and A390.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/alpha-a390-and-a290-new-sony-dslr-models/">Alpha A390 and A290: new Sony dSLR models</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="" style="width: 450px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_311.jpg" alt="Sony Alpha A390 and A 290" title="Sony Alpha A390 and A 290" width="450" height="337" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-816" srcset="https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_311.jpg 450w, https://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_311-300x224.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px" /><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Sony Alpha A390 will offer Quick Live-View and a 14.2mp sensor.</figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>June 10, 2010:</strong> Remember when Sony waited a full 18 months to introduce a new dSLR after releasing the A100? Now it seems they seldom wait more than 18 days before releasing a new model. Okay, that may be a slight exaggeration, but the Sony dSLR factory will soon be cranking out two new entry-level models: the A290 and A390.</p>
<p>Sony is aiming the new A-mount cameras at first time dSLR users, and the specs are similar to earlier Alpha starter dSLRs. The new cameras are obviously closely related, the principle difference being the tilting live view system on the A390.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_815" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-815" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A290_151.jpg" alt="Sony A290" title="A290_15" width="300" height="284" class="size-full wp-image-815" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-815" class="wp-caption-text">Sony A290</figcaption></figure>Both cameras will use a 14.2 megapixel sensor, and they include the usual Sony Alpha feature set: Steady Shot image stabilization, Sony and Minolta A-mount lens compatibility, pop-up flash and 9-point auotfocus system.</p>
<p>A couple of things set the new modles apart from earlier editions. There is a new grip design, which Sony claims is more comfortable to use. in addition, both cameras include HDMI output and BRAVIA Sync, so you can view images on your big-screen television if you are so inclined.</p>
<p>Because Sony is targeting first time dSLR buyers with these cameras, both models include Sony&#8217;s on-screen Help Guide and Graphic Display program.</p>
<p>The tilting live-view follows the design first offered in the A350 and A300.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_814" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-814" style="width: 299px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/A390_271.jpg" alt="Tilt LSD screen on the A390" title="A390_27" width="299" height="207" class="size-full wp-image-814" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-814" class="wp-caption-text">Tilt LSD screen on the A390</figcaption></figure>Sony of Europe has announced that the A290 and A390 will be available in Summer 2010. Will the new cameras be sold in the United States? So far, there is no mention of the new cameras on Sony&#8217;s US web site. The Sony A450, profiled here some months back, has been on the market for several months&#8230;but it is not sold in the US.</p>
<p>Will Sony offer the A290/A390 in the USA? Or do they have something else in mind?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/alpha-a390-and-a290-new-sony-dslr-models/">Alpha A390 and A290: new Sony dSLR models</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/alpha-a390-and-a290-new-sony-dslr-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony A900, We hardly knew ye. Goodbye flagship?</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-a900-we-hardly-knew-ye-goodbye-flagship/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/sony-a900-we-hardly-knew-ye-goodbye-flagship/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flagship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Did the Sony Hong Kong site leak news of the demise of the Sony  Alpha A900?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-a900-we-hardly-knew-ye-goodbye-flagship/">Sony A900, We hardly knew ye. Goodbye flagship?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><figure id="attachment_744" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-744" style="width: 297px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/DSLR-A900VG_left_med.jpg" alt="End of the line for the A900?" title="DSLR-A900VG_left_med" width="297" height="210" class="size-full wp-image-744" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-744" class="wp-caption-text">End of the line for the A900?</figcaption></figure><strong>May 10, 2010</strong> If you&#8217;ve been caught up in the excitement of the imminent Nex-3 and Nex-5 EVIL cameras from Sony, you may have overlooked the bells tolling for the A900.</p>
<p>Several rumor sites are claiming that Sony&#8217;s Hong Kong site is listing the A900 as discontinued.</p>
<p>Curious, I checked the site myself. I couldn&#8217;t find anything expressly saying Â the A900 was discontinued, but significantly, the A900 was not listed among the Alpha dSLRs offered for sale. The site lists the top model as the A850.</p>
<p>It could be a simple error, but I am inclined the rumors have at least some truth to them, I don&#8217;t have access to sales figures, but I would guess  that A900 sales have flatlined since the introduction of the Sony A850. The cameras are nearly identical, but the A850 can save you several hundred dollars. Unless you really, really need the faster frame rate of the A900, the A850 is a much better bargain.</p>
<p>Does this mean the A850 is the new flagship? I doubt it. I would assume that there is a new flagship on the launching ways, and Sony will replace the A900 with something better. At least I hope that is the case.</p>
<p>Some of the rumor sites are expecting an A900 replacement to be announced along side the new Sony EVIL twins.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that. I think a brand new top-of-the-line dSLR deserves it&#8217;s own special day. At the same time, a completely new camera system should have it&#8217;s own special day.</p>
<p>I could be wrong, but I would expect we will see the Sony Nex models first, with a new full-frame dSLR (if there is one coming soon) following some time afterward.</p>
<p>We may know as soon as tomorrow, as Sony has apparently chosen May 11 to announce the Nex system.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-a900-we-hardly-knew-ye-goodbye-flagship/">Sony A900, We hardly knew ye. Goodbye flagship?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/sony-a900-we-hardly-knew-ye-goodbye-flagship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want great floral photos? Try a conservatory</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/want-great-floral-photos-try-a-conservatory/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/want-great-floral-photos-try-a-conservatory/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orchid Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Conservatories are great for photographs. Vivid colors, exotic subjects, wonderful lighting and a protected location provide the basis for portfolio-worthy images.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/want-great-floral-photos-try-a-conservatory/">Want great floral photos? Try a conservatory</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; width: 252px; padding-top; 9px;"><figure style="width: 230px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32698815@N04/4540724494/" title="Picture Perfect day by TomBonner, on Flickr"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="A number of venders were on hand for the Picture Perfect day at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens, including Apple Computer who demoed the new Aperture 3." src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4005/4540724494_695f5f2b7e_m.jpg" title="Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens" width="240" height="160" style="margin-top: 12px;" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A number of venders were on hand for the Picture Perfect day at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens, including Apple Computer who demoed the new Aperture 3.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p><strong>April 22. 2010</strong> A few weeks ago, I attended the &#8220;Picture Perfect&#8221; weekend at the Daniel Stowe Botanical Gardens. The program included several photo workshops and gear demonstrations. After the workshop concluded, I wandered over to the Orchid Conservatory and collected some new images.</p>
<p>The conservatory is great location for photographs. In the first place, it is filled with exotic, colorful flowers, most of which you won&#8217;t see in the average garden. So the conservatory offers up an almost unlimited array of vivid subjects.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the lighting at the DSBG Conservatory is fantastic. There is glass in nearly every direction, and the resulting shadow-free light can turn an ordinary snapshot into a portfolio photo.</p>
<p>Finally, because you are indoors, there is no breeze to disturb the leaves and petals. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love taking my Sony Alpha dSLR outdoors and capturing nature photos. But when you are trying to capture razor sharp close-ups, any kind of breeze becomes a frustration. You get the composition just right, then a cats paw comes up and shifts your subject around.</p>
<p>Inside a conservatory, there are no sudden gusts, so the flowers remain stationary while you arrange your shot. You can take all the time you need to set up your image, confident that the focus and composition won&#8217;t change.</p>
<div style="float: left; width: 345px;"><figure style="width: 303px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/32698815@N04/4540081497/"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="A  tripod and a sharp lens make it a snap to get images like this at your local conservatory." src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2755/4540081497_972b4dcb52.jpg" title="DSBG Orchid Conservatory" width="333" height="500" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">A steady tripod and a sharp lens make it a snap to get images like this at your local conservatory.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p>I put together a gallery of my best images from the <a href="http://alphatracks.com/orchids/">DSBG Orchid Conservatory</a>. While there was plenty of light to shoot hand-held, I used a tripod for the bulk of the shooting that day. Because my subjects were unlikely to move, placing the camera on a tripod allowed me to set critical focus knowing I wouldn&#8217;t shift the lens toward or away from the flowers.</p>
<p>Although I used a wide-ange lens to capture some establishing shots, photographing orchids is work for long lenses. I used the Minolta 70-210 f/4 &#8220;beercan&#8221; for the majority of my gallery images. The beercan features a close-focusing mode, as well as wonderful bokeh in the out of focus areas.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty happy with my results. If there is an indoor conservatory in your area, grab a tripod,  your camera and some long, close-focusing lenses. If it is anything liker the Daniel Stowe Conservatory, you will come away with some great photos!</p>
<h2>View the <a href="http://alphatracks.com/orchids/" style="color: blue" >DSBG Orchid Gallery</a></h2>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/want-great-floral-photos-try-a-conservatory/">Want great floral photos? Try a conservatory</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/want-great-floral-photos-try-a-conservatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sony Alpha A200 dSLR: a Photographic Autopsy</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/sony-alpha-a200-autopsy/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/sony-alpha-a200-autopsy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Graphic photos of a wrecked and dismantled Sony Alpha dSLR provide insights into what's inside our digital cameras.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-alpha-a200-autopsy/">Sony Alpha A200 dSLR: a Photographic Autopsy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-top: 12px; margin-right: 12px;"><figure id="attachment_599" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-599" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://bit.ly/9KfCtA" target="_blank"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/smashed_dslr.jpg" alt="The English Russia website digs deep into the innards of a crushed Sony Alpha dSLR " title="dSLR autopsy " width="300" height="320" class="size-full wp-image-599" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-599" class="wp-caption-text">The English Russia website digs deep into the<br />innards of a crushed Sony Alpha dSLR </figcaption></figure></div>
<p><b>March 17, 2010</b> If you&#8217;ve got a strong stomach, you might want to take a look at the A200 photo essay on the <strong>English Russia</strong> website.</p>
<p>The photos examine a very mangled <strong>Sony Alpha A200 dSLR.</strong> I don&#8217;t know what happened to this camera, but it&#8217;s demise was very violent. It wasn&#8217;t just dropped or knocked off an end table.</p>
<p>Since the site doesn&#8217;t explain how the camera got in this state, I let my imagination fill in the blanks. It might have been tossed off the observation deck of a very tall building, or someone may have left it on the roof of their car and it flew off at 70mph. It might have been run over by a truck. My favorite theory is that a paparazzi tired to surprise Chuck Norris and Norris deftly dismantled his camera with his feet.</p>
<p>Whatever happened to the poor A200, its days as a fine photographic instrument are over. The only thing this wreck of a camera could capture is dust.</p>
<p>But that isn&#8217;t to say the dSLR is completely useless. It will never record an image to a memory card again, but it can serve as a learning tool. The people at the English Russia site grabbed a screwdriver and a working camera and proceeded with a thorough autopsy of the dead dSLR.</p>
<p>If you love fine cameras, the photos are disturbing, but fascinating. These photos may be a little too graphic for A200 owners. Consider this a warning. If you have nightmares after visiting the site, don&#8217;t blame me.</p>
<h3>Not a dSLR repair manual</h3>
<p>This is not a disassembly manual. These photos won&#8217;t teach you how to repair your Sony Alpha A200.</p>
<p>Instead, these images are reminiscent of a high-school biology class, where the students dissect a frog to see what is inside. The students don&#8217;t intend to put the frog back together afterward, so they simply cut away muscle and sinew to get to the more interesting bits underneath.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what happened with the A200. They dismembered the camera to see what was inside, knowing they couldn&#8217;t hurt anything. The camera was dead, repairing it wasn&#8217;t an option. So they delved deep into the innards and recorded what they found.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen pristine cut-away cameras from Sony and other manufacturers. Those photos don&#8217;t have the impact the photos (apparently taken by <a href="http://bit.ly/aSAqci" target="_blank">Jollypix.com</a>) have. Looking at the guts of the camera, you gain a deeper appreciation of the complexity inside an ordinary dSLR. Don&#8217;t forget that the A200 has fewer features than Sony&#8217;s high-end dSLRs. What would the innards of an Alpha A900 or A850 look like?</p>
<p>My original Minolta SRT was a fully mechanical camera. The only electronic hardware was in the meter. Each subsequent SLR I bought added additional circuitry, becoming more and more electronic inside.</p>
<p>Examining these amazing photos shows just how far cameras have advanced from the old mechanical cameras of the past. It also makes me wonder how the inside of my dSLR can be so packed with circuits and ribbon cable, yet be so reliable. It seems like there are all manner of things that could go wrong. Yet my cameras continue to function well and record outstanding images under very demanding conditions.</p>
<p>These images should make all of us appreciate our cameras and how special they are. They are also a reminder to the paparazzi in us all to keep our dSLRs away from Chuck Norris!</p>
<p>See the <a href="http://bit.ly/9KfCtA" target="_blank">Sony dSLR dissection</a> at the English Russia website.</p>
<p>Additional photo at <a href="http://bit.ly/aSAqci" target="_blank">Jollypix.com</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/sony-alpha-a200-autopsy/">Sony Alpha A200 dSLR: a Photographic Autopsy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/sony-alpha-a200-autopsy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Sony Alpha hardware at the 2010 PMA Show</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/new-sony-alpha-hardware-at-the-2010-pma-show/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/new-sony-alpha-hardware-at-the-2010-pma-show/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A-Mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMA Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sony teased Alpha users with several "concepts" at the 2010 PMA show. No word on when these cameras will be sold, but this is a preview of future Sony Alphas.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/new-sony-alpha-hardware-at-the-2010-pma-show/">New Sony Alpha hardware at the 2010 PMA Show</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure id="attachment_562" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-562" style="width: 450px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-562" title="Sony_PMA" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Sony_PMA.jpg" alt="Sony displayed some very exciting concepts at the 2010 PMA show." width="450" height="338" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-562" class="wp-caption-text">Sony displayed some very exciting concepts at the 2010 PMA show.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Sony teased Alpha photographers with several interesting &#8220;concepts&#8221; at the latest PMA show. As these are concepts, there is no definite word on when or if these cameras will appear. Still, the concepts Sony has shown at previous PMA shows have come to fruition, and Sony has already hinted about the new lenses they showed off at Anaheim.</p>
<p>Sony&#8217;s new concepts include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Concept model of an ultra-compact interchangeable lens digital camera system that packs the quality of a DSLR camera in an extraordinarily small body, along with interchangeable lenses</li>
<li>Mid-range concept camera for advanced users (a successor to the Î±700) as well as concept mainstream models</li>
<li>Prototype of a Super Telephoto Lens (500mm F4 G) with class-leading optical performance</li>
<li>Prototype of a Distagon T 24mm F2 ZA SSM, new Carl Zeiss wide angle lens for superior shots of landscapes and sweeping vistas</li>
</ul>
<p>The new &#8220;mirrorless&#8221; concept is NOT a 4/3 type camera, but appears to be Sony&#8217;s own design. It will offer interchangeable lenses on a tiny body similar to a larger point and shoot. It will carry the Alpha name, but I can&#8217;t be sure it uses A-Mount lenses. I hope Sony will not attempt to produce two separate lens lines.</p>
<figure id="attachment_563" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-563" style="width: 450px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-563" title="sonyconcept2" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sonyconcept2.jpg" alt="New mirrorless interchangeable lens Alpha cameras are coming; will they use A-Mount lenses?" width="450" height="261" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-563" class="wp-caption-text">New mirrorless interchangeable lens Alpha cameras are coming; will they use A-Mount lenses?</figcaption></figure>
<p>The other two dSLRs are look more conventional. Neither model has a model name engraved on it, and it is difficult to see where Sony could actually add a model name, as there doesn&#8217;t appear to be any room between the grip and the prism.</p>
<p>The A700 successor appears smaller and more rounded than the original A700. I don&#8217;t see a PC sync port, but there is a top mounted LCD panel. No word if the new model will have video, but it does appear to have a pop-up flash.</p>
<figure id="attachment_561" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-561" style="width: 450px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-561" title="sonyconcept3" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sonyconcept3.jpg" alt="Also on display, the successor to the A700 and a new very compact ALpha model." width="450" height="336" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-561" class="wp-caption-text">Also on display, the successor to the A700 and a new very compact ALpha model.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The other dSLR is much smaller. Based on the comparison between it and the A700 replacement, it is possibly the smallest dSLR on the market. Sony hasn&#8217;t provided an indication of the sensor size or megapixels, but I think it might create a lot of interest for those who want a compact dSLR that still has an optical mirror.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/new-sony-alpha-hardware-at-the-2010-pma-show/">New Sony Alpha hardware at the 2010 PMA Show</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/new-sony-alpha-hardware-at-the-2010-pma-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sony Alpha A450: Where does it fit in Sony&#039;s line up?</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/the-sony-alpha-a450-where-does-it-fit-in-sonys-line-up/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/the-sony-alpha-a450-where-does-it-fit-in-sonys-line-up/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[A450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alphatracks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha dSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The new A450 takes the highly regarded A550, ditches the Quick Live View and the tilt-out LCD but maintains the fast 7fps burst mode. In addition, Sony claims the NPH500 battery should give users over a 1000 pictures on a single charge.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/the-sony-alpha-a450-where-does-it-fit-in-sonys-line-up/">The Sony Alpha A450: Where does it fit in Sony&#039;s line up?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin: 0 12px 0 0; color: blue;">
<figure id="attachment_365" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-365" style="width: 210px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-365" title="Sony_Alpha_A450" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Sony_Alpha_A450.jpg" alt="New Sony A450 will join the Alpha fleet in February." width="210" height="167" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-365" class="wp-caption-text">New Sony A450 will join the Alpha fleet in February.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>Remember the time when some people said Sony wasn&#8217;t serious about the dSLR market because it took the company 18 months to release another camera after the initial A100 came on scene? Now we know what the Sony Engineers were doing during those 18 months; they were busy creating cameras to fit every conceivable dSLR niche. Not content with the six (or was it seven?) new Alpha models introduced in 2009, Sony is starting off 2010 with another entry in the crowded low-end of the market.</p>
<h2>Introducing the new A450</h2>
<p>The new entry, dubbed the A450, takes the highly regarded A550, ditches the Quick Live View and the tilt-out LCD but maintains the fast 7fps burst mode. In addition, Sony claims the NPH500 battery should give users over a 1000 pictures on a single charge.</p>
<p>The is also an auto HDR mode, and naturally the camera includes the popular Stay Shot image stabilization feature. Another new feature is the Manual Focus Check Live View, which can preview the image at 7x or 14x image previews.</p>
<h2>A significant new dSLR</h2>
<p>Some people have already started dismissing the new entry, since it lacks some of the more compelling features of the A550 and does not offer video. If Sony prices this A450 right, however, I think it will beÂ a very significant entry in Sony&#8217;s dSLR arsenal.</p>
<div style="float: left; margin-right: 12px; color: blue;">
<p><figure id="attachment_366" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-366" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-366" title="sony_alpha-A450_controls" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/sony_alpha-A450_controls-300x248.jpg" alt="Control layout of the A450 is similar to the A500 and A550." width="300" height="248" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-366" class="wp-caption-text">Control layout of the A450 is similar to the A500 and A550.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p>Fist, as I already said, Sony&#8217;s selection of lower end dSLRs is getting quite crowded. I think Sony might start weeding out some of the A230, A330 and A30 models once the A450 is on the scene. The A450 can&#8217;t replace all of those models by itself, obviously. But since it is less full featured than the A550, Sony will have price the A450 much lower to make it attractive.</p>
<p>The 12mp A500 lists for $749, while the 14mp A550 is priced at $949. So where will the A450 come in?</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t much room between the A380 and the A500 for the A450 to play in. If the A450 drops below the price of the A380, then buyers will have an interesting decision to make. Grab the A380 with the tilt-out Live View or go for the A450 with its 7fps shooting speed and nearly twice the battery life.</p>
<p>If Sony prices the A450 Â higher than the A500, the new camera might be hurt by the A500. Price the A450 under the A500 and you might just kill sales of the A500.</p>
<p>Sony hasn&#8217;t officially announced the A450Â at this point, but the Sony press release is all over the internet. It is expected that the official announcement will come at the CES show  this week. While the release doesn&#8217;t indicate a price, it does say the camera will be available in February, 2010.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll find the Sony Global <a href="http://bit.ly/6DDzIr" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Alpha A450 presentation</a> here. Sony has also made available a <a href="http://bit.ly/8Ni2xZ" target="_blank" class="broken_link">detailed A450 Spec Sheet</a> in PDF format.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have more on the A450 as details emerge.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/the-sony-alpha-a450-where-does-it-fit-in-sonys-line-up/">The Sony Alpha A450: Where does it fit in Sony&#039;s line up?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/the-sony-alpha-a450-where-does-it-fit-in-sonys-line-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A foggy Christmas at the Billy Graham Library</title>
		<link>https://alphatracks.com/a-foggy-christmas-at-the-billy-graham-library/</link>
					<comments>https://alphatracks.com/a-foggy-christmas-at-the-billy-graham-library/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Bonner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphatracks.com/?p=352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>High ISO images of nighttime Christmas decorations at the Billy Graham Library in the fog.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/a-foggy-christmas-at-the-billy-graham-library/">A foggy Christmas at the Billy Graham Library</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 16px;;">
<figure id="attachment_351" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-351" style="width: 199px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-351" title="Silo, Billy Graham Library" src="http://alphatracks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/billy_graham_silo-199x300.jpg" alt="The Silio at the Billy Graham Library decorated for Christmas" width="199" height="300" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-351" class="wp-caption-text">The Silio at the Billy Graham Library decorated for Christmas</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p><strong>Dec. 23, 2009</strong> My family spent a recent evening at the Billy Graham Library to enjoy the wonderful Christmas decorations. My Sony Alpha was welcome, no restrictions on photography, except that flash cannot be used in the exhibit halls.</p>
<p>No problem, I simply cranked the ISO up to 800 and shot without a flash. As I have said in the past, I am usually conservative about ISO, but I enjoyed the freedom that comes with shooting at a high ISO.</p>
<p>The Library featured decorationsÂ inside and out, and as an unexpected bonus, there was a heavy layer of fog in the area.  I hate driving in fog, but it adds drama and mystery to photos. The mist defused the lights, producing interesting streaks and shadows.</p>
<p>You can visit the <a href="http://adventuresindesign.com/minolta/009_billy_graham_library/index.html">Christmas photo gallery</a> here. Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>Wishing all my readers a Merry Christmas and a great 2010!</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://alphatracks.com/a-foggy-christmas-at-the-billy-graham-library/">A foggy Christmas at the Billy Graham Library</a> appeared first on <a href="https://alphatracks.com">Alphatracks</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://alphatracks.com/a-foggy-christmas-at-the-billy-graham-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
